|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: MI5VictimMI5Victim
Date: Dec 31, 2006 16:29
Observer article 9/March/1997
Fame at last! In an alleged book review in the Observer (Books p16), Jay Rayner writes about a "man called Bob"
(one of my many pseudonyms) in whom "a lot of people have shown an interest". Read and ponder!
Perhaps the Chinese curse "may you live in interesting times" could be re-worded into "may you be considered an
interesting person". Infamy, infamy, they've all got it in for me!
1504
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: MI5VictimMI5Victim
Date: Dec 31, 2006 11:36
.net magazine article March/1998
Britain's .net Magazine featured my website on page 17 of their March 1998 issue (number 42). They quote from the "FAQ"
pages, and also include some details of the evidence I have tried to present on my website.
The age of some of the material on the website shows in this review, which says the case "has been discussed in uk.*
newsgroups during the past year". At this time (March 1998) it has been discussed on uk.misc for three years, and there
are still occasional traces of the discussion going on.
579
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: SteveSteve
Date: Dec 31, 2006 11:28
> Hi,
>
> Just as a change from the pathetic rants (mostly emanating from other NGs,
> I know) I'd like to wish everyone a
>
> ************************
> A Happy New Year!
> ************************
>
Ditto. Even the PC mob can't find a fault in that.
Happy New Year everyone....
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: masonic hamstersmasonic hamsters
Date: Dec 30, 2006 04:35
> Well, the Chillenden Murders were committed in Kent, and Surrey is also
> in the Home Counties.
So its got nothing to do with Surrey then.
> It may well be relevant to you if the murderer is still at large.
... which he's not
> And your wife and kids. Dig?
>
My wife and kids are still at large, its true. I don't dig, no - got a bad
back.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: thedarkmanthedarkman
Date: Dec 29, 2006 21:53
The Michael Stone website has just been updated. The longest running
miscarriage of justice in Britain continues, but the CCRC is now hard
on the track.
G wrote:
>
> oh fuck me not you again ... got fed up with the "Free A Beast" campaign
> then
>
> G
|
| |
|
3 Comments |
|
|
Author: Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
Date: Dec 26, 2006 14:15
>
> "Richard Miller" seasalter0.demon.co.uk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:VbYJy1IZtVkFFw9K@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...>> In message news.t-online.com>, MM
>> yahoo.co.uk> writes>>>
>>>"Richard Miller" seasalter0.demon.co.uk> schrieb imNewsbeitrag
>>>> In message news.t-online.com>, MM
>>>> yahoo.co.uk> writes>>>>>> I can only suggest you take a trip up to Coulsdon Chess Club and
> speak
>>>>>> to the people who knew Jessie best. Jessie was as level headed
>>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (2.08Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
Date: Dec 25, 2006 10:09
PeteM embankment.org> wrote in message
news:a7LC$IAdR9jFFwGG@none.com...> Cynic yahoo.co.uk> posted>>Without in any way referring to this particular case, there are
>>several possibilities that would cause all of a man's children to make
>>allegations against him apart from the obvious reason you have
>>accepted. Here's 4:
>>
>
> snip
>
> There are at least two other possibilities:
>
> * the mother and daughters sought financial gain by getting the father
> convicted then claiming compensation;
>
> * the principal accuser was unsure that her own accusations would be
> enough to get a conviction, so she persuaded the other three to make
> false accusdations of their own and so provide corroboration.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.50Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
Author: Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
Date: Dec 25, 2006 06:42
Cynic yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cqivo2l0pqum6imsqucs2o0erptit5s4eo@4ax.com...> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:38:39 +0000, Richard Miller
> seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>Actually, what I wonder is how a father could possibly get allegations
>>against him from all four of his daughters. The only possible answer as
>>far as I am concerned is that he is guilty.
>
> Without in any way referring to this particular case, there are
> several possibilities that would cause all of a man's children to make
> allegations against him apart from the obvious reason you have
> accepted. Here's 4:
>
> 1) The man is disliked by his family for one reason or another, and
> the children deliberately want to cause him harm. The situation
> escalates more than they intended, but they cannot retract their lies
> and so weave the tangled web.
>
> 2) The mother has fallen out with her husband and has poisoned the ...
|
| Show full article (2.08Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
Date: Dec 24, 2006 10:13
> In message 4ax.com>, Mike Ross
> corestore.org> writes>>On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 13:11:22 +0000, PeteM embankment.org> wrote:
>>>>>No - remember that in rape cases there is an automatic reporting
>>>restriction on any fact that might indicate the identity of the accuser.
>>>Together with the DT's note that the other charges related to "three
>>>other females", this strongly suggests that the other accusers were
>>>Jessie's three sisters. In the circumstances, almost *any* fact reported
>>>about those charges would have revealed their identities.
>>
>>Well that was a conjecture that occured to me too. If the CPS were
>>unable to secure a conviction on *any* charges, with the evidence and
>>testimony - there must have been some - from *four* victims, three
>>still alive... one has to wonder very seriously about the strength of
>>the case and the wisdom of bringing it. Especially where the CPS are
>>quick to defend it as 'not a waste of money':
>> ...
|
| Show full article (2.06Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: GG
Date: Dec 24, 2006 06:05
> I admit I voted for them in 1997 but they are worse than the tories ever
> were in the worst days of the Major Gov., they are also hypocrites who
> treat
> us the voters with disdain
>
> Rant over :-) Merry Christmas
Same here so did i, and i agree 100%% with you ...
Merry xmas to you too
Regards
G
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
