> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
> -= the BBC, television and radio -=
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
>
> The first incident in June 1990 was when a BBC newsreader made what seemed
> to be a reaction to something which had happened in my home, and out of
> context of what they were reading. My first reaction was disbelief; nothing
> of the sort had ever happened before, the idea that such a thing could
> occur had not crossed my mind, yet there was no doubt of what had just
> taken place. My disbelief eroded as this recurred time after time. Besides
> the news, offenders included shows such as Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and
> "entertainment" shows. There seems to be very little moral understanding
> among the people who make these programmes; they just assume they will
> never be caught, so they carry on without a thought for the illegality or
> amorality of what they do. The only time I ever heard a word raised in
> doubt was by Paxman being interviewed by someone else (I think by Clive
> Anderson) back in 1990; referring to the "watching" he said it troubled
> him, and when asked by the host what you could do about it, replied "Well,
> you could just switch it off" (meaning the surveillance monitor in the ...

> On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:05:15 -0500, ah gmail.com> wrote:
>

>>Dick wrote:

>>> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:34:54 GMT, johannes sizefinospamtter.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>MK Fan wrote:

>>>>>
>>>>> Maurice Kellett rules!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Member #34 MK Fan Club

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>HearHearHearHearHearHearHearHearHearHearHearHearHearHearHearHear!

>>> ...

>
> [What d'yer mean he doesn't exist! Who eats the mince pies and drinks the
> sherry the kids leave by the chimney each year? :-))]
>
> --
> John

>On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:09:11 +0000, Humble Scribe
> wrote:
>

>>Similarly, those who claim that the absence of scientific proof of God
>>etc supports their atheistic arguments forget that scientific
>>discoveries have a relatively short shelf-life - i.e. they are "true"
>>only until the next scientific discovery challenges it. [How many
>>people still believe the Sun rotates around the Earth or that the world
>>is flat- both undeniable "scientific truths" at one time?]

>
>You seem to confuse a lack of belief in something with the need for
>scientific proof. I am an atheist when it comes to belief in Santa
>Claus, but you seem to think I should be agnostic. ...

>Do you stand in a baying crowd, or one of attentive love for Christ?

> Dear Kevin,
>

>>>>>>>> where is you evidence this ever happened?<<<<<<<

>
> The nature of the unrepentant man, has he changed, even in 2,000 +
> years, is not the evidence in the unrepentant? Tis only the laws of
> men, made in the consciousness of others, not the law of good
> conscience towards God that distances men from their own actions.
>
> Do you stand in a baying crowd, or one of attentive love for Christ?
>
> In Christ's love
> Carol T
>
>

>>>> So he's a poof?<

>
> No Mattic,
>
> God's version of love is not as low as men's concept...

> MK Fan wrote in news:qqajo29mmte0mvggnii7ik39nqc6fgf1cv@
> 4ax.com:
>

>> Maurice Kellett rules!

>
> Well, what are they? Can you post a list of them? How stringently are
> they enforced?
>

>
>
> MK Fan wrote:

>>
>> Maurice Kellett rules!
>>
>> --
>> Member #34 MK Fan Club

>
> There was never a Morris Kellet, it was made into the Riley Kestrel
> made from the Austin 1100/1300 range.
> http://www.practicalclassics.co.uk/profiles/vehicle/picture.ehtml?i=711;p
> =1805358694
>