I can't help but notice that most Americans call every U.S. department
"PERPS". Get focused, it is 'Masonic Perps' full stop. We in the United
Kingdom have overwhelming proof that the Freemasons are the road-sweepers
for the world's elite secret societies "The Illuminati/NWO".

Freemasonry is an international money making scam, the world's largest
pyramid scheme run by the Elite. Freemasonry brags about 5 million members
worldwide. If they all pay 20 Dollars a week, you don't have to be a rocket
scientist to realise that this is a lot of money to protect. If you want to
make the rich even richer then join the Masons.

If you vote to ban the practice of the Secret Societies (especially the
Masonic gangstalkers) then the Elite will have no protection and you won't
have to read forums like this again.
Please see www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/479012713

Yes, we can back up everything and would request that you give this posting
some publicity for the victims of this evil. This post was written by Joe
Stirling on behalf of our (growing fast) group called "Open Society" (not
secret society). Nothing To Hide.

Contact Open Society, 93 Ashburn Road, Glasgow G62 7PQ, United Kingdom.
Answerphone 0141 560 4743

- breakfast
- lunch
- supper

Is it just me who wonders if space aliens have the same sort of eating
patterns and eat every 4-5 waking hours .

Can we really just assume that earth habits are the center of the
universe and everything in the galaxy revolves around planet earth ? .

"frankie" spam.com> wrote in message news:456f1ad1_1@x-privat.org...

That's shocking use of English for the BBC "More than 200,000 British people
turn up at work with a hangover every day" When what they mean is presumably
"every day more than 200,000 British people turn up at work with a hangover"

I'm working on www.phptakeaway.co.uk at the moment and the thought has
just occured to me that - can space aliens phone for some takeaway food
to be delivered .

More importantly - do space alien takeaways also deliver to planet earth
and if so - how much is the delivery charge ? .

Of course they do how the feck do you think ET phoned home ?

If not - then how do they contact each other ? .

Communications with Security Service Tribunal in 1999

I took some more potshots at the SS-Tribunal in the first half of 1999. The correspondence between myself and the Tribunal
Secretary is detailed on this webpage. Ultimately I decided not to pursue another complaint with them, partly from Robin
Ramsay's advice (and that of a solicitor I consulted), but mostly because it was rather obvious from Mr Brooks' replies
that the Tribunal has no investigative means of its own and is that useless animal, a toothless watchdog.

Included with this first letter was a copy of the leaflet, "Complaints about the Security Service". This tells you that
the Tribunal can order "the service to end its inquiries about you; the service to destroy any records it holds about
those inquiries; the quashing of a property warrant; financial compensation". Yeah, right. Look, there's a flying pig, oink-flap, oink-flap.

My subsequent letter to Nick Brooks, Tribunal Secretary, dated 25 March 1999, said;

Dear Mr Brooks,

We spoke on the phone last week and you kindly sent a copy of the form,
"Complaints about the Security Service".

I have a few questions which I should like to ask you, before I undertake the task of
making a formal complaint. As you know I made a complaint in February 1997, and in June
of that year the tribunal made a bland and unsatisfactory statement that "no determination in
your favour has been made on your complaint". During our phone conversation I expressed
the view that the Tribunal was incapable of performing its functions and acts as a
whitewashing body for the Security Service. My questions are as follows;

"Boz" btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:EqadnRfX4qLTa_DYnZ2dnUVZ8sqdnZ2d@bt.com...

A letter from MI5

I wrote to the Security Service stating that I wished to bring a complaint against their activities in my life. Here
is their reply; "if you believe you have been the subject of inquiries by the Security Service or that the Security Service
has done anything else in relation to you or your property, you may wish to apply to the Security Service Tribunal who are
able to pursue these points on your behalf."

Please see further items for replies from the Security Service Tribunal, and Interception of Communications Tribunal.

347

My claim against BBC is struck out

My summons was struck out on the basis of it "disclosing no reasonable cause of action". The district judge pointed
out that I had no clear evidence, which would be needed for the claim to have any chance of success. My intent to submit
the defendants to interrogatories or cross-examination also cut no ice with the district judge.

I was prevented from issuing further proceedings against the BBC without leave of the court. But this differs from a
"vexatious litigant" order; I am still able to sue other organisations and individuals.

346