> "bob&carole" hotmail.com> wrote:

>>Bob LeChevalier wrote:

>>> "bob&carole" hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>I repeat..EVERY normal person hates pedophiles, bottom line.
>>>>Why do you think they are caged for life when caught?

> ...

>>> Your own postings seem to disprove your claim that "they are caged for
>>> life when caught"?

>>
>>And they are foreign pedos in foreign countries, knob
>>Have you checked the new US anti-ped laws lately?

>
> Which ones in particular? The 2006 law only appears to mandate a life
> sentence for repeated conviction of certain aggravated crimes against
> children.

> Johnny wrote:

>>> I've been to lots of those in that case. Does this mean that every
>>> time you meet up with someone else who posts here counts as a
>>> miniboink? Let's see now - not counting Steve, there are all the
>>> occasions Dave has been to our house; the times I've bumped into JH or
>>> N-L in Cockermouth; I've met Tony and Barry and probably a few others
>>> on various random occasions; and then of course, there's Edith, but
>>> she's always been a special case.......
>>> ally-being-silly

>> They don't count unless the intention is to meet because of the uklc
>> connection. So ours do and yours don't.
>>
>> Johnny-so-there!

> I think you have it. There has to be an element of setting up arrangements
> and then, that of social conviviality - both of which elements our
> meetings have definitely had.
>

>

>

>> All of this , and the upsurge in other violent crime, makes an
>> unassailable case for the return of the death penalty IMHO.

>
> Do you really believe it's ok to allow the State to execute
> its innocent citizens?

>>> My Nova Scotia property is about 50 ft ASL.
>>>

>> Your having a second home in NS is broadly equivalent to me
>> having one in Germany!
>>
>> Yet another example of your profligate waste of our natural resources.

>
> Right! You're off the list of friends who can use my seaside cottage!
>
> Which doesn't exist, BTW.
>
> Johnny-has-land-but-no-home-in-NS
>

> Johnny wrote:

>>>> So you have! But does it actually count as a boink if only two people
>>>> from uklc are actually present? I wonder if there's a minimum number
>>>> - a sort of quorum - required in order to make it a 'proper' boink,
>>>> as opposed to a casual meeting?
>>>>
>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>>> ally
>>>>

>>> Hmmmph.
>>>
>>> Maybe we could call it a miniboink.
>>> ;-/
>>>
>>> Jp

>>
>> I would have challenged the phrase 'casual meeting' myself. It seemed ...

>> I've been to lots of those in that case. Does this mean that every
>> time you meet up with someone else who posts here counts as a
>> miniboink? Let's see now - not counting Steve, there are all the
>> occasions Dave has been to our house; the times I've bumped into JH or
>> N-L in Cockermouth; I've met Tony and Barry and probably a few others
>> on various random occasions; and then of course, there's Edith, but
>> she's always been a special case.......
>>
>> ally-being-silly

>
> They don't count unless the intention is to meet because of the uklc
> connection. So ours do and yours don't.
>

> One of the main root causes in the UK is the drug trade. Drug addicts would
> mug their own mothers to get their fix. Maybe we should bring back the death
> penalty for convicted drug dealers? That would strike at the root of the
> problem.

> We could largely avoid this debate if we dealt effectively with the
> root causes of criminal behaviour.

> It's the same issue with the health care system: we treat people
> after they get sick rather than keep them healthy in the first place.