Author: StimpyStimpy
Date: May 5, 2008 23:43
On Tue, 6 May 2008 06:46:48 +0100, Jim wrote
> Rowland McDonnell wrote:
>
>> Why not? Normal dishonest debating tactics, of the sort I've
>> got use to from the tossers who have taken over here.
>
> Aaaaaand this is where I bow out. I've got better things to do than
> continue an increasingly pointless discussion with someone who's going
> to start making dishonesty claims and get increasingly abusive.
I see Rowland is still treating 'debate' as some sort of abstract
intellectual exercise involving tactics rather than just exchanging views and
information.
I'm sorry but, as I've said before, the only response he understands is to be
danced round by a bunch of 10-year olds pointing and singing "Loony, loony"
|