Must hold a decent charge on the battery - LMK

newsgroups @ mmillar . co . uk

"SantaUK" clause.com> wrote in message
news:ruydnXH8k_FkR67YnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d@pipex.net...

Could you not buy a nice brand new one for that??
Acer do some nice ones in that price range!

Gary

Been looking - thought I would give it a try on here!

--
Regards

SantaUK

"dvdphile" ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:biSYg.31515$6C2.3440@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...

Try these for good deals on laptops

http://www.ebuyer.com/UK/store/45/cat/Notebooks/Laptops

:)

Hi, i noticed ebuyers site is not loading the images but everything
else seams ok to be. Just to let you know theres a new site just been
lauched at www.bigbuyer.co.uk the service will be better then ebuyers
and the prices will be good. the site is still been added to but if you
just crate an account this month you will get a free gift. so take a
look at it. Hope this is useful to you all. They have big backing for
major players and over 1000 new items will be added to the selection
over the next month.

http://www.bigbuyer.co.uk

"Paul" bigbuyer.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1161435838.323042.265790@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

I dont suppose you have any possibly affiliation with that superb site?

You do realise that selling OEM software on it's own is strictly against the
T+Cs
You've got full size images loading in thumbnails - looks terrible
Your prices arent that good, nothing is "in stock", and the site is littered
with spelling mistakes.

I Dingsdale wrote:

We are not part of ebuyer in anyway

"Paul" bigbuyer.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1161510533.578457.188220@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

Raj (remove.) wrote:

Paul wrote:

It's a big mistake to go live with an ill-prepared site, for a start.
As someone else said, your site makes you look like an amateur or a
schoolboy, littered with spelling mistakes, no easy way to get to your
homepage, the grammar and punctuation is truly awful. The whole thing
looks totally unprofessional.

Look at, for instance, your offer of Microsoft Office 2003. It's
"Microsoft", not "MicroSoft", and what semi-literate put together the
sentences "Not tested but we think this is new. Will refund if it dont
work. Discs in new condition. COA on the back of packet. With Business
Contact Manager"? I mean, for goodness sake, just how long does it take
to check whether a piece of software works or not?

And