WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.adverts.computer only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.adverts.computer Profile…
 Up
WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: schoenfeld.one
Date: Apr 5, 2008 19:51

In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
towers. A top-down controlled demolition can be simply characterized
as a "pancake collapse" of a building missing its support columns.
This demolition profile requires that the support columns holding a
floor be destroyed just before that floor is collided with by the
upper falling masses. The net effect is a pancake-style collapse at
near free fall speed.

This model predicts a WTC 1 collapse time of 11.38 seconds, and a WTC
2 collapse time of 9.48 seconds. Those times accurately match the
seismographic data of those events.1 Refer to equations (1.9) and
(1.10) for details.

It should be noted that this model differs massively from the "natural
pancake collapse" in that the geometrical composition of the structure
is not considered (as it is physically destroyed). A natural pancake
collapse features a diminishing velocity rapidly approaching rest due
the resistance offered by the columns and surrounding "steel mesh".

DEMOLITION MODEL
Show full article (4.97Kb)
12 Comments
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: Janitor of Lunacy
Date: Apr 5, 2008 19:57

gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b5fb3627-2ee1-4ab5-9ad9-a8441657f23a@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
> accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center

This was bollocks two months ago, and it's bollocks now. Fuck off.
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: Mike Ross
Date: Apr 5, 2008 20:42

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 19:51:39 -0700 (PDT), schoenfeld.one@gmail.com wrote:
>In this article we...

...repeat a bunch of pseudo-scientific bullshit you posted a little while ago.

Mike
--
http://www.corestore.org
'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: Ishtar
Date: Apr 6, 2008 01:33

On Apr 6, 3:51 am, schoenfeld....@gmail.com wrote:
> In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
> accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
> towers.

===========================

This is of no importance.

The ruling group are not doing it to us.
We are doing it all to ourselves.
We created the ruling group from our collective mental illness.

"Exposing corruption in the ruling group" is actually a case of
exposing our collective mental illness.

Your survivalist-mode mass scotoma conceals that simple truth from
your thought processes at this time.
Show full article (1.27Kb)
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: Shaun
Date: Apr 6, 2008 04:22

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 19:51:39 -0700 (PDT), schoenfeld.one@gmail.com
wrote:
>In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
>accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
>towers. A top-down controlled demolition can be simply characterized
>as a "pancake collapse" of a building missing its support columns.
>This demolition profile requires that the support columns holding a
>floor be destroyed just before that floor is collided with by the
>upper falling masses. The net effect is a pancake-style collapse at
>near free fall speed.
>
It was really skilled of the pilots to crash just above the floors the
explosives were planted, in order to make it look like the collapse
was caused by the massive structural damage of having a large jets fly
into them
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: News reader
Date: Apr 6, 2008 05:17

Janitor of Lunacy wrote:
> gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b5fb3627-2ee1-4ab5-9ad9-a8441657f23a@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>> In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
>> accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
>
> This was bollocks two months ago, and it's bollocks now. Fuck off.
>
>
And it was truly amazing how stealthfuly the demolition experts were
while they were working for weeks on end to place the explosives in
extacly the right places while there were 10,000+ people coming and
going on a daily basis.

Get a life you conspiracy theory nut-job.
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: GB
Date: Apr 6, 2008 06:24

Do please read about Pyotr, whose Doosmday sect have come up with a brand
new way of burying themselves in rubble.

http://news.google.co.uk/news?hl=en&tab=wn&ned=uk&q=pyotr
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: Kenny McCormack
Date: Apr 6, 2008 06:42

In article <7sudnbiHuuPyImXanZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@giganews.com>,
News reader blank.net> wrote:
>Janitor of Lunacy wrote:
>> gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:b5fb3627-2ee1-4ab5-9ad9-a8441657f23a@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>>> In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
>>> accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
>>
>> This was bollocks two months ago, and it's bollocks now. Fuck off.

Gotta love the list of groups to which this is cross-posted...!
>And it was truly amazing how stealthfuly the demolition experts were
>while they were working for weeks on end to place the explosives in
>extacly the right places while there were 10,000+ people coming and
>going on a daily basis.

This is just flat out wrong. First of all, modern office buildings
always have armies of "building types" (janitors, workers, whatever you
want to call them) coming and going all the time, doing "g*d knows what".
Show full article (1.32Kb)
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: Stephen J. Rush
Date: Apr 6, 2008 08:15

On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:33:02 -0700, Ishtar wrote:
> On Apr 6, 3:51 am, schoenfeld....@gmail.com wrote:
>> In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
>> accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
>> towers....
Show full article (1.21Kb)
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition         


Author: nicksanspam
Date: Apr 6, 2008 10:08

News reader blank.net> wrote:
>... it was truly amazing how stealthfuly the demolition experts were
>while they were working for weeks on end to place the explosives in
>extacly the right places while there were 10,000+ people coming and
>going on a daily basis.

You mean the Securicom guys who worked for Marvin P. Bush? :-)

Nick
no comments
1 2