... +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote: I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds, but having at least one active buildd ... of messages... This is constructive. I can only speak for the security buildd network, but redundancy in the buildd admins increases the responsiveness in which problems are fixed by a great deal and ...

On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:38:52AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: Awww, just when we were able to keep it constructive for a couple of messages... Redefining "redundancy" is constructive? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote: I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds, but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a possibly inactive backup buildd who could quickly be made active in case the primary buildd fails. I'd add “having a responsive buildd maintainer”, uploading packages in a timely fashion. Cheers, -- Cyril ...

...only have a single active buildd listed when they're supposed to have two. I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds, but having at least one active buildd who ... as well. (mostly considering alpha here, as apparently mips/mipsel indeed do not have redundancy right now) Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a ...

... http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html lists that alpha, mips and mipsel a having buildd redundancy, but that does not seem to match reality as both only have a single buildd (alpha:...Don't understand what you're trying to say here. My point is that apparently we _had_ buildd redundancy at some point, but have lost it for some reason. To me that indicates a problem for the ...

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:32:40AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html lists that alpha, mips and mipsel a having buildd redundancy, but that does not seem to match reality as both only have a single buildd (alpha: goetz; mips: ball; mipsel: rem). Hmm, etch is already released. You might be right that it's not done for lenny yet. Though that's ...

http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html lists that alpha, mips and mipsel a having buildd redundancy, but that does not seem to match reality as both only have a single buildd (alpha: goetz; mips: ball; mipsel: rem). Both mips and mipsel also currently seem to be having problems keeping up even though AFAIK there are no really special circumstances. This results in a fairly ...

.../Office 2007) machines for Outlook.pst and discovererd that they were in: c:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\Microsoft\Outlook I was surprised at the "redundant" last two subfolders. On the old (Win2K/Office 2000) machines, the pst files are in the same path except for the last two subfolders: c:\Documents and Settings\...

...and in fact makes my whole pc sluggish. | | Recently when trying to do a search of my emails I got an error that | it couldn't access the .pst file due to a cyclic data redundancy. Is | there a way to fix this? It was actually happening earlier and I | uninstalled it and bought a fresh copy and reinstalled. Any thoughts | appreciated (well good ones at least :) )

...-tips.net/ http://www.howto-outlook.com/ "THOMAS CONLON" wrote: When i start Outlook, it cannot open my PST file. It says "Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)" and then just stops. I tried running chkdsk on the drive, and it did not find problems. When i ran scanpst.exe, Windows crashed and blue-screened. Is ...