>
> Correspondence with Keith Hill MP, 1997-2001
>
> In early 1997 I went to see my local MP, Keith Hill (Labour - London
> Streatham), at one of his surgeries, to ask his advice
> and enlist his support in combating the MI5 conspiracy. He appeared
> helpful during the meeting, promising assistance to find
> a lawyer and help with my legal efforts. Unfortunately, a month after the
> meeting he was much less inclined to assist, as the
> following letter shows.
>
> My thought on reading his letter was that he had appeared helpful at the
> surgery merely to get rid of me without a fuss; he
> never had any intention of constructive advice or assistance.
>
> I wrote to Mr Hill a year later, on 20 May 1998, stating that I wished to
> make a complaint to Police regarding the continuing
> actions against me, and requesting his help in so doing. He responded a
> week later;
>
> Again I wrote to Mr Hill on 10 November 1998, stating;
>
> I am sure you will remember me from your surgery a year and a half ago,
> and subsequent letter dated 20/5/98 which is reproduced
> over the page.
>
> Once again I am asking you if you can help me, particularly in obtaining
> the passenger list for the BA flight in 1993, where four
> of my persecutors confronted me. The harassment has restarted over the
> last two weeks, by "coincidence" as I have restarted
> faxing your fellow MPs. If these faxes worry my persecutors then they must
> be having some effect - therefore, I feel encouraged
> to continue them.
>
> Several of your Parliamentary colleagues have expressed the view that I
> should be making more of an effort to secure the
> assistance of my MP rather than presenting the matter to random members of
> the Commons. I hope you will be more helpful now
> than on the earlier occasions I contacted you.
>
> His response was in the following terms;
>
> Presumably it is somewhat unusual for a British Member of Parliament to
> threaten a constituent with arrest by Police on the
> grounds of excessive communication. Being a legal neophyte I sought the
> advice of a local solicitor, who opined that no case
> existed for a charge of harassment;
>
> In any case, who would I be harassing? Only Mr Hill, or hundreds of
> Westminster MPs simultaneously? I wrote again on 1 February
> 1999 to Mr Hill, enclosing my solicitor's advice above. Mr Hill did not
> respond to the letter.
>
> Finally, in May 2001 I received an election missive from Mr Hill, stating
> "But I do hope you felt that I had at least tried
> to help." Presumably Mr Hill hasn't threatened many of his other
> constituents with arrest on the basis of excessive faxing,
> but the reader will be aware of the irony of the phrasing of his election
> communication.
>
> For my subject access request to Mr Hill's office in 2002, please follow
> this link.
>
> 607
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>