The Economic Numbers Racket
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
triangle.general only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

triangle.general Profile…
 Up
The Economic Numbers Racket         


Author: me
Date: May 11, 2008 07:28

An interesting analysis of the changes in the way we measure the economy
over past 47 years and how the leadership in washington dc have mislead in
order to make themselves appear successful.

This is a link to an abridged article by Kevin Phillips. The original is in
Harper's Magazine, which requires a subscription:
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2008/Pollyanna-Creep-Economy1may08.htm

John Kennedy, out-of-work Americans who had stopped looking for jobs - even
if this was because none could be found - were labeled "discouraged workers"
and then excluded from the ranks of the unemployed.

Lyndon Johnson orchestrated a "unified budget" that combined Social Security
with the rest of the federal outlays. This innovation allowed the surplus
receipts in Social Security to mask the emerging federal deficit.

Richard Nixon created a division between "core" inflation and headline
inflation. If the Consumer Price Index was calculated by tracking a bundle
of prices, so-called core inflation would simply exclude, because of
"volatility," categories that happened to be troublesome (and thus in the
"headlines"). At that time, it was food and energy (as it is now).
Show full article (2.39Kb)
1 Comment
Re: The Economic Numbers Racket         


Author: Dweezil Dwarftosser
Date: May 11, 2008 20:09

A very good - and accurate - article as long as
you can ignore the motivations imputed to the
various presidents by politically-motivated
pundits through the years.

I knew that the scam which excludes "discouraged
workers" from the ranks of the unemployed had been
in place for a very long time - but I was hoping
to see the name of the "culprit" president who
included panhandlers in the ranks of the employed.

(Anyone who works an hour per week, or those who
earn $50 in a week from any source; "Off the books"
or not, they are counted as employed.)

It really surprised me that the military was considered
"outside the workforce" until Reagan. Incarcerated
prisoners and the inmates of mental institutions are
outside the workforce; they cannot choose to be gainfully
employed. But GIs? It was nonsense to exclude them.

Figures lie, and liars figure. It's all in the way it
is presented.
Show full article (1.00Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Standard number format and number of digitscomp.sys.hp48 ·
Auto Number does not match number of records12 microsoft.public.access.gettingstarted ·