Anyone want to make some campaign collateral? tee-shirts, bumper
stickers....?
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/04/does-clinton-ha.html

Perhaps truck nuts?
http://www.thatsnutz.com/truck-nuts-c-65.html

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080430/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_terrorism_report

'WASHINGTON - Al-Qaida has rebuilt some of its pre-Sept. 11 capabilities
from remote hiding places in Pakistan, leading to a jump in attacks last
year in that country and neighboring Afghanistan . . .'

. . . send more troops to Iraq and elect Cheney in November.

--g

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:55:35 +0200, "Norbert"
hidden-city-remove.net> wrote:

Not really.

Don't bother.

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:14:16 -0700, Roy aa4re.ampr.org> wrote:

Youz need a faster machine! I'm Guy Polis. I know about these
things.

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:52:18 -0700 (PDT), TOM bex.net> wrote:

Detroit area??? What kind of asshole are youz?
Youz gotta be joking.

Hi folks, my turn to roil the waters...

The reason John McCain wants to continue the Bush Administration's
policies, especially the Iraq Occupation is because the presidency alone
is no longer sufficient to allow the Republican Party to lead. Without
war powers, they are hamstrung.

You can't consistently override the will of the people without war
powers; you have to negotiate with the house & senate, and at least show
respect to the judiciary.

You can't spend money so fast you're afraid to protect the national
forests for fear of running out of paper to print it on (see
http://www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html - or if you buy the white
house's own estimates, it's still bad: http://zfacts.com/p/318.html).
You have to use war powers to distract the public during wholesale
raiding of the treasury.

War powers make it possible for the Republicans to support only their
key constituents: the oil, banking, health and insurance lobbies, and
the wealthiest 1%% of US citizens. All it takes is fear. Fear covers up
defying the nation's laws, defying congress, and defying common sense.

Good idea, or bad?

(I've tried it, once, two general elections ago.)

CON:
- The recent change to immediate registration AND same-day
voting doesn't seem to provide the opportunity to
validate any of the info a new registration presents.
Anybody know if these types of "instant" ballots are
labelled "Provisional" or just counted as valid?
- The kiddies, so proud to vote for change (without having
a clue about the candidate's stance on the issues) tend
to vote WAY too much in advance. When the facts finally
come out, they might realize they made a big mistake -
and voted for a candidate who really didn't match their
requirements at all.

On Apr 28, 7:33 am, Whodun...@earthlink.net wrote:

Don't forget to vote no.

The bastid county commissioners even paid to send out a mailer promoting their
own position. Um...yeah, I have the utmost confidence you'll be spending the
*new* revenue as wisely as the old revenue.

We intend to use the land transfer tax to lobby for an even bigger land transfer
tax...yeah, that's the ticket. Maybe they should wait for a mortgage crisis
before passing this tax so we can really stick it to those forced to sell their
over-valued homes.

Oh, wait...

--Tedward

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:53:03 -0700 (PDT), invincible
googlemail.com> wrote:

That's because youz are doing something really dumb.

BWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWA!!!!!