MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters. Lie & Deny They're Watching Me

Central to the persecution campaign waged against me for. some nine years
now by. the Security Service is their use of the media, and in particular
the broadcast media, to. make clear to me that I am under surveillance and
being watched within my own home, even by BBC newscasters while they. read
the news. This is really an act of arrogance; MI5 and their tools. in the
television and radio are so sure. that they can never be caught, that they
have. many times made explicity clear on broadcast programmes that they are
as capable of seeing me as I am of seeing the broadcast. pictures. Even
when they have known I am taping. the programmes they still carry on this
practice; for. examples of TVand radio presenters caught "in action", see
the Evidence area of. my website.

If. you wish to reply to this article......
then please include your name. and fax number! I provide the means for
recipients to. send me their thoughts on the topics discussed, but ask that
you provide me with your. fax number or email address if you require a
response. Also would you. please send not more than one or two pages, if by
fax.. Thank-you!

It started with a Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters. today

Four Years of "MI5 Persecution" Posts on. Internet Newsgroups

For approximately the first three years of the MI5 persecution,. from June
1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet as possible, in. the hope that by not
reacting, MI5s interest in me would decrease and they would. simply go away
of their own. accord. This is the sort of behaviour some people employ
against bullies; if the bullies arent getting. a reaction, then they might
simply go away and victimize. someone else.

Unfortunately, this tactic didnt. work. The quieter I became, the more
shrill and hysterical the noise. from the Security Service operatives. For
about two years I didnt watch TV news at. all. Yet this only heightened
their obsessed fixation; they continued to follow me wherever I. went, they
continued. to induce harassment at work by managers and fellow workers, and
they continued to encourage me to commit suicide. They seemed to. regard my
refusal to react as a crime which they would have to "put. right" by ever
more. extreme forms of abuse.

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday. 30 April, 1999

If You Intend To Reply,. Please Read This
Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or. two will
be deleted without. being read.

Somewhere between 0 and. 100%%

The last few. days there have been no clear recordable instances of
abuse. However, while travelling on the Underground, while walking. around
near my home and going to friends homes, I am constantly. troubled by
thoughts that those people over there might. be about to get at me; that
the couple sitting in the opposite seats laughing are. in fact laughing at
me; et. cetera, et cetera.

A comment by. a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He
described the possible scale of the epidemic as. "between 0%% and 100%%". It
might not be happening, it might not happen at. all, to any discernable
degree.... or it might be total. Without. clear recording, which seems to
have become impossible the last couple of weeks, there is no. way of
knowing whether the. harassment really is continuing, whether we have
entered a temporary hiatus, or whether. perhaps it has perhaps stopped for
now.

MI5. Persecution Update: Friday 16 April, 1999

If You Intend To Reply,. Please Read This
Please.... keep your. response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will
be deleted. without being read.

BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant stop. himself laughing

During 1990-91 there were. very many instances of "interactive
television". where newscasters and other TV presenters saw on a screen
before them what was happening in my home,. and reacted, frequently by
laughing at me. During this period. I unfortunately did not record these
programmes. For the last year or two, I. have been recording everything I
watch, and there. has been a drastic decrease in such incidents.

However, on occasion, television presenters do. still engage in
"interactive watching". and react to what they see. This has been evident
with Jon Snow. of Channel Four News recently - a particularly interesting
case, since it has been established that he cannot. be corrupted by money
(it. is well-documented that MI5 offered him a tax-free salary and he
turned. them down). I wonder what device MI5 are using to encourage him to
do. the "interactive watching"?