Meteoritic Dust

Meteoritic dust is accumulating on Earth so fast that, after 4 billion
years (at today's low and diminishing rate), the equivalent of more
than 16 feet of this dust should have accumulated. Because this dust
is high in nickel, Earth's crust should have abundant nickel. No such
concentration has been found on land or in the oceans. Therefore,
Earth appears to be young (a).

a. Steveson, pp. 23-25.

Most Scientific Dating Techniques Indicate That the Earth, Solar
System, and Universe Are Young.

For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by
evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15
years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of
100!

The earth is approximately 5 billion years old by a variety of
scientific methods. And it is also round, not flat as you may also
believe. Don't invent bad science to discredit the theory of
evolution that has never been disproven by any form or legitimate
experiment or observation for hundreds of years. You evolved from an
early primate, most likely Australopithecus, that first arose in
Africa. Look in the mirror and around you. You are a primate, a
product of milliions of years of evolution. What you just wrote makes
you look more like a monkey than a human. Tell me we aren't closely
related to chimpanzees and the great apes when we share 95%% of our
genes with them. Wake up. The fact that life evolved on Earth
without intelligent design and that we are having this discussion on
the...

Modern geologists consider the age of the Earth to be around 4.54
billion years (4.54×109 years).[1] This age was determined by
combining the interpretations of oldest-known terrestrial minerals -
small crystals of zircon from the Jack Hills of Western Australia -
and astronomers' and planetologists' determinations of the age of the
solar system based in part on radiometric age dating of meteorite
material and lunar samples.

1 Age of the Earth. U.S. Geological Survey (1997). Retrieved on
2006-01-10.
2 England P., Molnar P., Richter P., 2007. John Perry's neglected
critique of Kelvin's age for the earth: A missed opportunity in
geodynamics. GSA Today v.17 (1), 4-9. doi: 10.1130/GSAT01701A.1

On Dec 19, 1:52 pm, Pah...@gmail.com wrote: