Conclusion
All dating techniques, especially the few that suggest vast ages,
presume that a process observed today has proceeded at a known, but
not necessarily constant, rate. This assumption may be grossly
inaccurate. Projecting present processes and rates far back in time is
more likely to produce errors than extrapolation over a much shorter
time. Furthermore, a much better understanding usually exists for
dating "clocks" that show a young Earth and a young universe.
This contrary evidence understandably disturbs those who have always
been told that the Earth is billions of years old. Can you imagine how
disturbing such evidence is to confirmed evolutionists?
http://www.creationscience.com/
