The Essential Teaching Of Jesus: "Love All People As Yourself" And we
do this best by following the Golden Rule: "Treat Others As You Would
Like To Be Treated."

HTML at http://www.loveallpeople.org/pearl-essential.html

By Rev. Bill McGinnis, Director - LoveAllPeople.org

The teachings of Jesus all boil down to one essential teaching: "Love
all people as yourself." And how do we do this? We do this by following
The Golden Rule, which is, "Treat others as you would like to be
treated."

Here is how we come to these conclusions, based on Biblical Scripture:

Jesus was asked directly to say what the most important commandment
was. His answer came in two parts: Love God more than anything else;
love your neighbor as yourself.

MARK 12:28-34 (RSV)

[28] And one of the scribes came up and heard them disputing with one
another, and seeing that he answered them well, asked him, "Which
commandment is the first of all?"

[29] Jesus answered, "The first is, `Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God,
the Lord is one;

You're too smart for this board! I don't get it (nm) (Was: Leo Wanta
Scenario, New World Order Damned If You Do, Damned If you Don't Fact
or Scam?"

Jeff 154.5.128.237 wrote:

Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net) wrote:

Fri Aug 18, 2006 18:11

j: > You're too smart for this board! I don't get it (nm

rk: Jeff, thank you for your candidness.

rk: Isn't what you said the whole point I have been trying to make on
these newsgroups/forums. It isn't a matter of being smart but of being
aware. My intelligence can be said to be "not normal" that is, it
does not fall into the "recognizeable" sandbox category of dream fed
scenarios force fed into malable, nondiscriminating, trusting
intellects via mind controllers.

rk: I merely ask people to wake up and find out for themselves their
True Estate, Their True Intelligence.

rk: AND IT PISSES THEM OFF!!

rk: Why? Because they "instantly" feel their own limitation in the
Mirror of Truth, and they DON'T LIKE IT ONE DAMNED BIT.

Leo Wanta Scenario, New World Order Damned If You Do, Damned If you
Don't Fact or Scam?

By: Raymond Ronald Karczewski

In rec.scouting.issues Cathy Weeks weeksfamily.net> wrote:
: Lee wrote:
:> Again, it's the perceived differences that matter.
:> Adolf Hitler. Nazi-ism. Big cultural difference.

: What if I told you that the majority of Americans were anti-semetic,
: (we turned away jewish refugees, both children and adults) AND we did
: nothing about the atrocities (despite knowing about them) until at last
: *photos* and newsreels showed what was going on. Eye-witness accounts
: written in the newspapers weren't enough - and were often relegated to
: short articles near the back.

Personally, I don't think the majority of Americans are anti-semetic (and
i'm not sure anti-semetic is spelled right, but I used your spelling)...

Anyway, does this have a place in rec.scouting.issues?

Has the United States only turned away jewish people?

: Not even most of the German public was aware - they didn't see pictures
: and news reels, of what was going on until after the war. Maybe if they
: had seen them, they might have overthrown the Nazis, but the Nazis,
: unsurprisingly, didn't allow the German public to see those photos and
: newsreels.

In article e250.ripco.com>, Chicago Paddling-Fishing says...

In rec.scouting.issues Cathy Weeks weeksfamily.net> wrote:

: Chicago Paddling-Fishing wrote:
:> In rec.scouting.issues Chimp yahoo.com> wrote:

:> You should ask the original poster what actual info she's interested in...

: Ah, I got my question answered a long time ago. And the conversation
: has moved on. That's why they didn't dwell on it, because I asked a
: question, AND got an answer.

: I'm not sure what *you* are looking to do at this point? Prove that
: Athiests are Bad(TM) people? My original question and suggestion was
: proven to be false. That's fine. I was wrong. Now, can we move on to
: discuss other issues? Like what factors lead to massacres? What
: protects us? How to stop new ones from happening?

Well... lets be honest here, no one just asks a question here... there is
always some angle to posting this stuff to rec.scouting.issues...

Yes, your suggestion that all mass murder is related to religion was false...

Be it psychological, sociological or ideological, the sad part is people
lose their lives; most likely over something they have no control over.

In article <1155930415.630965.298820@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, Cathy Weeks
says...

In rec.scouting.issues Chimp yahoo.com> wrote:
: Chicago Paddling-Fishing wrote:
:> In rec.scouting.issues Cathy Weeks weeksfamily.net> wrote:

:> Well, I'd have to say, starting from the top down... the top three would
:> seem to be Athiests...

: Those with the most Athy? ;-)

Um... sure I guess (depending on what Athy is...)

:> * China (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:People's_Republic_of_China)
:> "... Although the period after 1969 was less chaotic, the leaders of the
:> Cultural Revolution proper remained in...

In article drn.newsguy.com>, Lee says...

In article <1155921594.036185.71250@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>, Cathy Weeks
says...

Yeah, when I searched on Dresden Hiroshima Bombing hoping to find some
comparison, some stating that Dresden had the greater number of dead jumped out
at me, but they were from decidedly leftist sources. I don't care for sources
with such obvious biases. And the wiki articles seemed pretty decent.