>spartakus@my-deja.com wrote:

>>By all means, express your best wishes to the ACLU, because they have
>>worked very hard to protect the rights of religious people.

>
>You're an Atheist. You support abortion :

> In article <1hprji8.9siqj9fu6pprN%%%%%%%%j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au>,
> j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au says...

>> Mujin wrote:
>>

>>> English naturally has different colloquial...

>
> Budikka666 wrote:
>
>
> Bud, it is very simple, no need to raise your blood pressure.

> In article 4ax.com>,
> calee@optonline.net says...

>> On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:43:58 -0600, Mujin
>> wrote:
>>

>>>In article <5...

>
> "wf3h" vsswireless.net> wrote in message
> news:1165080099.892327.293390@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...

>>
>> LotsaQuestions wrote:

>>> Earle Jones wrote:
>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>> What do you think about this dictionary entry?
>>>>> Abiogenesis
>>>>> the now discredited theory that living organisms can arise
>>>>> spontaneously from inanimate matter; spontaneous generation.
>>>>> www.dictionary.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that sound like science to you?

>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> It sounds like a definition with an axe to grind. ...

> Just saw this. Seriously, mine's going in the mail
> Monday morning. And even though they so very much
> deserve it, having earned it since 1947 & counting,
> I'm not making any references to the Anti-Christian
> Liberal Union, etc., but only wishing them a Merry
> Christmas & Happy New Year -- in the true spirit of
> Christmas. Let's hope the ACLU gets several hundred
> *million* Jesus-Christ-Is-LORD-mass cards this year...

> LotsaQuestions wrote:
>

>> wf3h wrote:
>>

>>>LotsaQuestions wrote:
>>>

>>>>wf3h wrote:
>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>says the neoscholastic who thinks religion is science.

>>>>
>>>>Now I have been posting here (TO) for a while, Can you point out
>>>>where I have said that religion is science?

>>>
>>>uh...your insistence that the supernatural is science??

>>
>>
>> Can you point out exactly where I insisted that the supernatural is ...

>
> Dana Tweedy wrote:

>> "LotsaQuestions" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1165075775.150661.166550@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
>> snip
>>

>>>>>
>>>>> "presumably"???

>>>>
>>>> Yes, do you have a problem with that?

>>>
>>> No I do a lot of presuming, I just don't call my guesswork science. Do
>>> you?

>>
>> Presumption is not guesswork.

>
> Ok provide me with the formula so that I can create life from dead
> matter in my garage today? ...