>
> "mr bill"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:ys6Uj.183050$nr1.117239@newsfe13.phx...>> you are twisting it by launching into the whole "is he a
>> changed person" notion, which had nothing to do with what
>> i said.
>>
>> my statement was nothing more that to say that he is the
>> same poster who has identified himself as "robin" here
>> before. you go on in this reply to say "you saw him as
>> the same robin" which i did not say, nor imply. that is
>> twisting things.
>>
>> for whatever reason you have, you chose to read my
>> statement as saying that he has not changed over the
>> years, which was not what i said or thought. you assigned
>> ideas to me, and therefore motives to me, that were not
>> mine, but yours. that is twisting things.
>
> This is how you saw/see it
> Not me, and not where *I* was coming from with it.
> You are now twisting it and assigning ideas/motives to
> ME that are not mine, but are yours.
> That is YOU twisting things.
>
>
>>>
>>> "mr bill"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:UQZTj.182866$nr1.133739@newsfe13.phx...>>>>i did not say that. this is an example of you
>>>>deliberately being contrary. i was saying nothing more
>>>>than he is the same person who has posted here before. i
>>>>was in no way saying or implying that he has not changed
>>>>over the years.
>>>>
>>>> why do you take simple statements and twist them so,
>>>> carrie?
>>>> :)
>>>
>>> I took what you said and added my thoughts to it.
>>> Built on it.
>>> Which, to me is what discussion is. Sharing, adding
>>> to it. I don't see that I said you SAID something you
>>> didn't.
>>> You saw him as the same Robin, I saw him as changed
>>> (over time) I first knew him on
marianne.com and he was
>>> totally different than.
>>> Why do you see it as me twisting things?
>>> The only way to not have this happen is not respond
>>> to what you write anymore.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "mr bill"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:NiETj.181819$nr1.89622@newsfe13.phx...>>>>>> he is the same robin.
>>>>>> :)
>>>>>
>>>>> He is the same as he was over the past 10 or so years
>>>>> (online)?
>>>>> The same one continually identified with being in E.A.
>>>>> I've known him (off and on) online for all that time
>>>>> and he's not the same as he used to be, to me.
>>>>> Though probably it's my mind that has changed about
>>>>> him.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deborah
pumpetypump.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:296t14tej1prpgnh41cfndcobfuam4dam9@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 May 2008 04:23:53 GMT, Gene
>>>>>>>>
chewbacca.org>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Robin, I assumed you posted and left; I don't
>>>>>>>>>recognize you
>>>>>>>>>as one of the regulars here.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Robin" = "Bodhi", I believe. Used to be with EA,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> left.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you sure? I thought about that, but this Robin
>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>> Wapnickian-Renardian. Of course, if he used to be in
>>>>>>> EA it
>>>>>>> would be a trifecta for bad Course teachers-Gary,
>>>>>>> Chuck and
>>>>>>> Ken. Wow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
