|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: ellieellie Date: Dec 19, 2007 11:02
"Without judgment are all things equally acceptable, for who could
judge otherwise?" ~ ACIM
|
| |
|
| | 14 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Reality ScanReality Scan Date: Dec 19, 2007 11:13
On Dec 19, 1:02 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Without judgment are all things equally acceptable, for who could
> judge otherwise?" ~ ACIM
Without judgment the mind couldn't perceive.
If the mind couldn't perceive then the mind wouldn't be in the grip of
perception, but in heaven where one knows directly and does not
perceive through judgment.
Hence the purpose of true judgment is to relinquish all need to
perceive and regain the state of heaven/knowledge.
Hence while the mind is mis-perceiving its important not to tolerate
errors of thought and judgment.
This passage does not support nihilism.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: ellieellie Date: Dec 19, 2007 11:28
On Dec 19, 11:13 am, Reality Scan netzero.com> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 1:02 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "Without judgment are all things equally acceptable, for who could
>> judge otherwise?" ~ ACIM
>
> Without judgment the mind couldn't perceive.
>
> If the mind couldn't perceive then the mind wouldn't be in the grip of
> perception, but in heaven where one knows directly and does not
> perceive through judgment.
>
> Hence the purpose of true judgment is to relinquish all need to
> perceive and regain the state of heaven/knowledge.
>
> Hence while the mind is mis-perceiving its important not to tolerate
> errors of thought and judgment.
>
> This passage does not support nihilism.
|
| Show full article (0.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Reality ScanReality Scan Date: Dec 19, 2007 11:32
On Dec 19, 1:28 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 11:13 am, Reality Scan netzero.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 19, 1:02 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> "Without judgment are all things equally acceptable, for who could
>>> judge otherwise?" ~ ACIM
>
>> Without judgment the mind couldn't perceive.
>
>> If the mind couldn't perceive then the mind wouldn't be in the grip of
>> perception, but in heaven where one knows directly and does not
>> perceive through judgment.
>
>> Hence the purpose of true judgment is to relinquish all need to
>> perceive and regain the state of heaven/knowledge.
>
>> Hence while the mind is mis-perceiving its important not to tolerate ...
|
| Show full article (1.11Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ellieellie Date: Dec 19, 2007 11:37
On Dec 19, 11:32 am, Reality Scan netzero.com> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 1:28 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 19, 11:13 am, Reality Scan netzero.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Dec 19, 1:02 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>> "Without judgment are all things equally acceptable, for who could
>>>> judge otherwise?" ~ ACIM
>
>>> Without judgment the mind couldn't perceive.
>
>>> If the mind couldn't perceive then the mind wouldn't be in the grip of
>>> perception, but in heaven where one knows directly and does not
>>> perceive through judgment.
>
>>> Hence the purpose of true judgment is to relinquish all need to
>>> perceive and regain the state of heaven/knowledge. ...
|
| Show full article (1.40Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Lotus_BloomLotus_Bloom Date: Dec 19, 2007 11:56
On Dec 19, 1:13 pm, Reality Scan netzero.com> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 1:02 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "Without judgment are all things equally acceptable, for who could
>> judge otherwise?" ~ ACIM
>
> Without judgment the mind couldn't perceive.
>
> If the mind couldn't perceive then the mind wouldn't be in the grip of
> perception, but in heaven where one knows directly and does not
> perceive through judgment.
>
> Hence the purpose of true judgment is to relinquish all need to
> perceive and regain the state of heaven/knowledge.
>
> Hence while the mind is mis-perceiving its important not to tolerate
> errors of thought and judgment.
>
> This passage does not support nihilism.
|
| Show full article (0.75Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: MikeMike Date: Dec 19, 2007 12:51
On Dec 19, 2:56 pm, Lotus_Bloom tx.rr.com> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 1:13 pm, Reality Scan netzero.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Dec 19, 1:02 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> "Without judgment are all things equally acceptable, for who could
>>> judge otherwise?" ~ ACIM
>
>> Without judgment the mind couldn't perceive.
>
>> If the mind couldn't perceive then the mind wouldn't be in the grip of
>> perception, but in heaven where one knows directly and does not
>> perceive through judgment.
>
>> Hence the purpose of true judgment is to relinquish all need to
>> perceive and regain the state of heaven/knowledge. ...
|
| Show full article (0.96Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: miraclelurkermiraclelurker Date: Dec 19, 2007 13:27
Reality Scan wrote:
> On Dec 19, 1:02 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Without judgment are all things equally acceptable, for who could
>> judge otherwise?" ~ ACIM
>
> Without judgment the mind couldn't perceive.
I have to disagree with this. One can simply perceive everything just
as it is ... without the filter of the *I* that always has an opinion as
it sorts, categorizes and labels all experience. It is that *I* filter
that can be quieted and even silenced at times. And when it is speaking
(and it always speaks first) it does not have to be given any validity.
This would be the commitment to deny the denial of truth.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: OneOne Date: Dec 19, 2007 14:15
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:13:12 -0800 (PST), Reality Scan
netzero.com> wrote:
|
| Show full article (0.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: OneOne Date: Dec 19, 2007 14:31
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:27:54 -0800, miraclelurker
charter.net> wrote:
>Reality Scan wrote:
>> On Dec 19, 1:02 pm, ellie yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> "Without judgment are all things equally acceptable, for who could
>>> judge otherwise?" ~ ACIM
>>
>> Without judgment the mind couldn't perceive.
>
>I have to disagree with this. One can simply perceive everything just
>as it is ... without the filter of the *I*
Please explain then the Course's concept of right-minded judgment and
how it fits in with your religious philosophy.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|