> If you have been reading the newsgroup over the past few days, you
> would have seen many posts I wrote. You would have also seen a pattern
> of replies, first by the poster gene, then by the poster deborah, and
> last by the poster ellen. Time after time. This rapid fire response on
> their part is called by some who no longer post here a "zombie
> attack." And it is has been a typical behavioral event over the years
> here in the newsgroup. The zombies, having been offended by ideas that
> are not in strict, rigid line with their orthodox religious
> perspective, ban together in teams and harass the offender. And,
> usually, said "offender" ends up leaving the newsgroup. That is the
> zombies' purpose: To drive off the unorthodox poster.
>
> A few days ago, an individual, returning after a ten year absence,
> commented that the newsgroup was much different from what it used to
> be. That individual also wondered where there might be a place on the
> internet better suited to a study of the book. I suggested that the
> person not try to study the book on the net, but to instead try to
> find a study group, or if necessary, to go it alone. I said this not
> simply because of a few of the regulars' propensity for zombie wars in ...

> If you have been reading the newsgroup over the past few days, you
> would have seen many posts I wrote. You would have also seen a pattern
> of replies, first by the poster gene, then by the poster deborah, and
> last by the poster ellen. Time after time. This rapid fire response on
> their part is called by some who no longer post here a "zombie
> attack." And it is has been a typical behavioral event over the years
> here in the newsgroup. The zombies, having been offended by ideas that
> are not in strict, rigid line with their orthodox religious
> perspective, ban together in teams and harass the offender. And,
> usually, said "offender" ends up leaving the newsgroup. That is the
> zombies' purpose: To drive off the unorthodox poster.
>
> A few days ago, an individual, returning after a ten year absence,
> commented that the newsgroup was much different from what it used to
> be. That individual also wondered where there might be a place on the
> internet better suited to a study of the book. I suggested that the
> person not try to study the book on the net, but to instead try to
> find a study group, or if necessary, to go it alone. I said this not ...

>On Mar 31, 2:57 am, MikeRyder nospam.com> wrote:

>> If you have been reading the newsgroup over the past few days, you
>> would have seen many posts I wrote. You would have also seen a pattern

>
> When you are looking to see zombies, that's what you'll see.
> Right now you are the one trying to drive everyone else off this newsgroup.
> And when you do, then what? You have to keep posting stuff to bait someone
>to come back and play with you again.
>

>On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:29:22 -0700 (PDT), Mike yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>

>>On Mar 31, 2:57 am, MikeRyder nospam.com> wrote:

>>> If you have been reading the newsgroup over the past few days...

> But in a newsgroup where the discussion is
> almost completely limited to Course theory, such an idea has
> apparently stuck a nerve.

>On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:36:20 -0400, "Carrie" kingcon.com>
>wrote:
>
>

>>
>> When you are looking to see zombies, that's what you'll see.
>> Right now you are the one trying to drive everyone else off this newsgroup.
>> And when you do, then what? You have to keep posting stuff to bait someone
>>to come back and play with you again.
>>

>
>And when the zombies are looking to see a religious apostate who
>"thinks he's special," that's what *they* will see.

>MikeRyder nospam.com> wrote in news:gnk2v35c9sr44nsdg9u8crmg2bil9p619b@
>4ax.com:
>

>> But in a newsgroup where the discussion is
>> almost completely limited to Course theory, such an idea has
>> apparently stuck a nerve.

>
>The "nerve" being that we all knew that, Mike.

> The "nerve" being that what I suggested went beyond your orthodox
> religious anaylsis.
>