| Re: The Perfection of God's Son |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: talk.religion.coursemiracle · Group Profile
Author: PieterPieter Date: Apr 2, 2008 07:39
"Pieter" schreef in bericht
news:47ee1a6f$0$31218$bf4948fe@news.tele2.nl...
>
> "Gene Ward Smith" chewbacca.org> schreef in bericht
> news:Xns9A6FA554BAD2Dgenewardsmithsbcglob@207.115.17.102...>> "Pieter" wrote in news:47ed78ba$0$3857
>> $bf4948fe@news.tele2.nl:
>>
>>> So you start from the supposition it *has* meaning.
>>
>> It's been in the vocabulary of philosophical theology and philosophy for
>> a
>> long, long time, Pieter,
>
> Ok;
>
>> so of course it has a meaning.
>
> Sorry, but this makes no sense!
Gene, it worries me still that after this remark
our discussion stopped. If this sentence is
offensive, as John seemed to suggest, I
apologize. It was not my intention at all.
I'm not a native English speaker; what I
wanted to say just was: "Sorry, but (imo
of course) this does not follow logically."
I hope you will see through my words
if they are badly chosen.
> Time does not create meaning.
>
>> The trouble is, which
>> one?
>
> The ego is as old as the world, and
> will never succeed in creating meaning.
> *Apart* from God, it is impossible
> to say anything sensible about Him.
| 
