>We are told that the Son has the capacity, lacking in Father and Holy
>Spirit, of believing in error. We are also told that the Son is a
>perfect creation. This really only makes sense if the ability to
>believe in error is a part of the Son's perfection. Yet how can this be?

>
>A perfect outcome of all things is sure. We are told that God's will
>will be done. The outcome is a part of God's eternal world, but the
>sin and pain of separation is not. If God creates His Son with the
>maximum of creative freedom, and if doing this leads to the best
>outcome, it becomes understandable. On this view, the outcome of having the
>Son created prior in order of cause and effect to the Holy Spirit
>would also be better. This all make sense to me--anyone else?