On Dec 26, 5:47Â pm, Carrie
yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 26, 2:59Â pm, Mike
aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Dec 25, 4:32Â pm, Carrie
yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> On Dec 25, 4:17Â pm, "Lotus_Bloom"
tx.rr.com> wrote:>
>>>> "Reality Scan"
gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>> On Dec 25, 2:04 pm, "Lotus_Bloom"
tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>> "Reality Scan"
gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>>>> On Dec 25, 1:17 pm, "Lotus_Bloom"
tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> "Reality Scan"
gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 25, 1:00 pm, "Lotus_Bloom"
tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>> "Reality Scan"
gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 25, 12:40 pm, "Lotus_Bloom"
tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>> Carrie is not stupid and no amount of saying so from you will
>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> way. Â And Bill, you can fuck off too.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sheryl is not a liar, nor hypocrite, no spineless chiropractor,
>>>>>>>>>>> nor
>>>>>>>>>>> unwelcomed poster around here.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> No matter what the freak Carrie and Katie have said, or how much
>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>> said it will make it that way.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> So Debs you can fuck off too.
>
>>>>>>>>>> Get out of the past John. Â Hey fuck you too and Merry Christmas.
>
>>>>>>>>> Well, geez, Debs --its interesting your remarks was not addressed to
>>>>>>>>> Carrie about her shit stirring, stuck in the past post to Sheryl
>
>>>>>>>>> In fact you are clearly upset that people did apply the substance of
>>>>>>>>> this remark and address Carrie's post about Sheryl.
>
>>>>>>>> It doesn't seem to bother you to pull a post from the past or others
>>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>> doing that. Â You wouldn't be hypocritically full of shit would you
>>>>>>>> John.
>
>>>>>>> Doesn't bother me when I wish to make a point when dealing with people
>>>>>>> who use history or presence for what ever is useful for them at the
>>>>>>> moment. So if you wish not be hypocritically full of shit yourself,
>>>>>>> then you might consistently never refer to the past.
>
>>>>>>> Â I
>>>>>>>> don't believe that Carrie has hard feelings for Sheryl.
>
>>>>>>> Really? Why then make an issue about her posting, while accusing her
>>>>>>> of self-promotion and not feeling this group is worth her attention to
>>>>>>> post?
>
>>>>>>> Its clear enough you lie and give defense to Carrie at the expense of
>>>>>>> any honest communication.
>
>>>>>>> Freakn asshole.
>
>>>>>> Hello she did announce she would not participate here, and yes she does
>>>>>> promote here, guess you haven't seen her posts.
>
>>>>> So what? Why should that be turned into an accusation and mocking?
>
>>>> I don't believe she was mocking her. Â You're quite sensitive with this.-
>
>>> Â Â I was responding to a post she put on here, after saying she didn't
>>> plan to paticipate HERE any more. She then posted an invitation to
>>> join a group her friend had started. Here, on the ng she doesn't feel
>>> worthy of her actual partitication, and has said this. She found a way
>>> to put posts on without the need to read anything on it while doing
>>> it.
>
>> Â Yes, she did this and should be drawn and quartered for
>> Â the hideous sinner that she is. Â A pox on her and all of
>> Â her family. Â And the horse she rode in on.
>
>>> Â Â I don't really respect Sheryl, after she lied about me and said I
>>> was laying, when I knew/know I wasn't. But, she has an image to
>>> maintain so I can understand it.
>
>> Â At least an admission that you are acting from ego. Â And
>> Â more value judgments. Â Merry Christmas to you, too.
>
>>> Â Â Â If people see me as a liar, gossip, etc (and Sheryl added to
>>> this, when it wasn't true) that's their choice. If she has to lie to
>>> have people see her in a certain way, that's her choice.- Hide quoted text -
>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>
>> Â Your response is full of value judgments; the type of
>> Â judgments the Course advises us to avoid. Â Instead of
>> Â overlooking unreality you make it real by attacking it.
>> Â Why do you do that? Â Why does anyone do that? Â Why
>> Â don't you just quit doing that? Â Stop defending yourself
>> Â against attacks real and imagined.-
>
> Â All I can be is my honest self. Whatever that is at the time, and
> whatever you (and others here) want to make of it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I don't accept that answer. You are telling me that all you
can be is a victim. It seems to me that you are trying to
justify following the whim of the moment whatever that
whim might be. I just don't believe we have such little
control over our lives.
