On Dec 26, 2:59Â pm, Mike aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 25, 4:32Â pm, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Dec 25, 4:17Â pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>>>> On Dec 25, 2:04 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>>>>>> On Dec 25, 1:17 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 25, 1:00 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 25, 12:40 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Carrie is not stupid and no amount of saying so from you will
>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> way. Â And Bill, you can fuck off too.
>
>>>>>>>>>> Sheryl is not a liar, nor hypocrite, no spineless chiropractor,
>>>>>>>>>> nor
>>>>>>>>>> unwelcomed poster around here.
>
>>>>>>>>>> No matter what the freak Carrie and Katie have said, or how much
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> said it will make it that way.
>
>>>>>>>>>> So Debs you can fuck off too.
>
>>>>>>>>> Get out of the past John. Â Hey fuck you too and Merry Christmas.
>
>>>>>>>> Well, geez, Debs --its interesting your remarks was not addressed to
>>>>>>>> Carrie about her shit stirring, stuck in the past post to Sheryl
>
>>>>>>>> In fact you are clearly upset that people did apply the substance of
>>>>>>>> this remark and address Carrie's post about Sheryl.
>
>>>>>>> It doesn't seem to bother you to pull a post from the past or others
>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>> doing that. Â You wouldn't be hypocritically full of shit would you
>>>>>>> John.
>
>>>>>> Doesn't bother me when I wish to make a point when dealing with people
>>>>>> who use history or presence for what ever is useful for them at the
>>>>>> moment. So if you wish not be hypocritically full of shit yourself,
>>>>>> then you might consistently never refer to the past.
>
>>>>>> Â I
>>>>>>> don't believe that Carrie has hard feelings for Sheryl.
>
>>>>>> Really? Why then make an issue about her posting, while accusing her
>>>>>> of self-promotion and not feeling this group is worth her attention to
>>>>>> post?
>
>>>>>> Its clear enough you lie and give defense to Carrie at the expense of
>>>>>> any honest communication.
>
>>>>>> Freakn asshole.
>
>>>>> Hello she did announce she would not participate here, and yes she does
>>>>> promote here, guess you haven't seen her posts.
>
>>>> So what? Why should that be turned into an accusation and mocking?
>
>>> I don't believe she was mocking her. Â You're quite sensitive with this.-
>
>> Â Â I was responding to a post she put on here, after saying she didn't
>> plan to paticipate HERE any more. She then posted an invitation to
>> join a group her friend had started. Here, on the ng she doesn't feel
>> worthy of her actual partitication, and has said this. She found a way
>> to put posts on without the need to read anything on it while doing
>> it.
>
> Â Yes, she did this and should be drawn and quartered for
> Â the hideous sinner that she is. Â A pox on her and all of
> Â her family. Â And the horse she rode in on.
>
>
>
>> Â Â I don't really respect Sheryl, after she lied about me and said I
>> was laying, when I knew/know I wasn't. But, she has an image to
>> maintain so I can understand it.
>
> Â At least an admission that you are acting from ego. Â And
> Â more value judgments. Â Merry Christmas to you, too.
>
>
>
>> Â Â Â If people see me as a liar, gossip, etc (and Sheryl added to
>> this, when it wasn't true) that's their choice. If she has to lie to
>> have people see her in a certain way, that's her choice.- Hide quoted text -
>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Â Your response is full of value judgments; the type of
> Â judgments the Course advises us to avoid. Â Instead of
> Â overlooking unreality you make it real by attacking it.
> Â Why do you do that? Â Why does anyone do that? Â Why
> Â don't you just quit doing that? Â Stop defending yourself
> Â against attacks real and imagined.-
All I can be is my honest self. Whatever that is at the time, and
whatever you (and others here) want to make of it.