|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: CarrieCarrie Date: Dec 27, 2007 06:58
On Dec 27, 9:43Â am, Mike aol.com> wrote:> On Dec 26, 5:47Â pm, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Dec 26, 2:59Â pm, Mike aol.com> wrote:>
>>> On Dec 25, 4:32Â pm, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>> On Dec 25, 4:17Â pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>
>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>>> On Dec 25, 2:04 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message> ...
|
| Show full article (6.22Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: CarrieCarrie Date: Dec 27, 2007 07:15
On Dec 27, 9:45Â am, Mike aol.com> wrote:> On Dec 26, 4:32Â pm, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> "Mike" aol.com> wrote in message>
>
>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>> On Dec 25, 1:00 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
|
| Show full article (3.93Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Reality ScanReality Scan Date: Dec 27, 2007 07:23
On Dec 27, 8:58 am, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 27, 9:43 am, Mike aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Dec 26, 5:47 pm, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> On Dec 26, 2:59 pm, Mike aol.com> wrote:>
>>>> On Dec 25, 4:32 pm, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>> On Dec 25, 4:17 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>
>>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>>>> On Dec 25, 2:04 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message> ...
|
| Show full article (7.01Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Dec 27, 2007 07:30
On Dec 25, 2:02Â pm, Reality Scan gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't know about that. I don't generally make gratuitious comments
> without evidence. And you are definitely and widely considered an
> asshole on the Asshole scale.
But then again, so are you. Face it, it's hard to find an ACIMhead
who isn't, hence the need to huddle together in dysfunctional little
hate cults.
Happy New Year!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Dec 27, 2007 07:32
On Dec 25, 3:08Â pm, "mazzenger" rocketmail.com> wrote:
Does> none of you have a freaking life, not even on christmas day?
>
Clearly you don't.
Once again we see how ACIM is the religion for finger-pointing
hypocrites.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Dec 27, 2007 07:41
With Holey Nancy missing, it appears that Sheryl now gets to take
over as Cult Martyr. How fun for her! How Special and Important she
must feel!
>Even
> though she made the choice not to participate here anymore.
> Â But, I guess if she doesn't want her name used in this way she can
> stop posting stuff about herself here. And, with self-promotion, ANY
> publicity is better than nothing...
For self-promoters any use of their name is a desirable one. As you
recall, Holey Nancy thanked me frequently for all the business I sent
her way. Of Curse, she was lying, but we all know that ACIM is about
whatever "works" in the moment!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Dec 27, 2007 07:44
That was some seriously sad shit!
On Dec 25, 11:54Â pm, Reality Scan gmail.com> wrote:> On Dec 25, 3:35 pm, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Dec 25, 4:18 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.70Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Reality ScanReality Scan Date: Dec 27, 2007 07:49
On Dec 27, 8:45 am, Mike aol.com> wrote:
> You say it was over and done awhile ago, yet you are the
> one who brings it up here on this thread. You say that
> it can be used by those looking for things to use. Yet,
> again, you are the one who brought it up. So, what are
> you using it for? What's the point if not to attack?
Lol. You are dealing with an accomplished troll out to provoke and
annoy, not someone willing to communicate honestly or reply with
anything but transparently phony and insincere retorts.
Of course troll are trolls are trolls --and trolls are common enough
on discussion groups, but what makes Carrie slimy and unsavory is her
very cynical use of spirituality and course spirituality to scam her
brothers in her troll games.
For example, you will find her constantly arguing for and lecturing on
peace and non-judgment, and respecting opinions, everyone is right,
etc. Then writes an in-your-face provocative post to Sheryl, while
lecturing others on peace and non-judgment on another, concurrent
thread.
|
| Show full article (1.72Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Dec 27, 2007 07:50
On Dec 26, 3:13Â pm, Lotus_Bloom tx.rr.com> wrote:
>
> I don't see it as good or bad,
You're lying, of Curse, but it's somewhat interesting watching you try
to convince yourself, Robo-Deb! I'm sure you know that you will never
convince anyone else.
I do wonder what one might get out of volunteering for a self-lobotomy
experiment. It doesn't take much thought to figure out why though.
Not that you care what anyone else thinks, of Curse, especially not
your gurus, huh, Zero?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Lotus_BloomLotus_Bloom Date: Dec 27, 2007 09:49
On Dec 27, 9:50Â am, Katie yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 26, 3:13Â pm, Lotus_Bloom tx.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> I don't see it as good or bad,
>
> You're lying, of Curse, but it's somewhat interesting watching you try
> to convince yourself, Robo-Deb! Â I'm sure you know that you will never
> convince anyone else.
>
> I do wonder what one might get out of volunteering for a self-lobotomy
> experiment. Â It doesn't take much thought to figure out why though.
> Not that you care what anyone else thinks, of Curse, especially not
> your gurus, huh, Zero?
And how do you come to the conclusion that someone is lying? What
does your response above have anything to do with what I was
responding too?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
