|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: CarrieCarrie Date: Dec 26, 2007 08:09
"aum-orchestra" wrote in message
news:d22a38a6-79fe-448b-999c-d61a9ad214fa@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On 25 dec, 23:29, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:
> This from a man that deliberately mispronounces someone name for
> disrespect.
> You are not better than Carrie.
Thank you. Which brings us closer to the seasons's
gift of recognition.
"Not better than...", -- thus not only 'not equally acceptable',
but also 'equally unacceptable'. Which is the whole
point all along. Only double standards could conceal this.
Names, behavior, thoughts and other manifestations
can be part of the veil that conceals the Savior in each
other, yielding to specialness, guilt and death, emphasizing
bodies and overlooking Content.
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Reality ScanReality Scan Date: Dec 26, 2007 09:01
On Dec 26, 10:09 am, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:
> I don't need or require "respect" from anyone. If what you write about me
> here is how you honestly feel about me, I'm not going to try and force you
> to change and be something you're honestly not. I am me and you are you and
> we could accept this and let it be. Well I can, you can do whatever you want
> and feel is right and true for you.
Lol. Yeah, damage control. Funny this thread started because you
wished to confront Sheryl for posting promotional items while no
longer actively participating on this newsgroup.
How is that accepting Sheryl as she is and letting it be?
The truth is you rarely let anything or anyone "be." Your nature is
to confront and invalidate and discredit then crow about respect for
everyone and letting everything be.
Get a life.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: MikeMike Date: Dec 26, 2007 11:51
On Dec 25, 2:17Â pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>> On Dec 25, 1:00 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>> On Dec 25, 12:40 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>> Carrie is not stupid and no amount of saying so from you will make it
>>>>> that
>>>>> way. Â And Bill, you can fuck off too.
>
>>>> Sheryl is not a liar, nor hypocrite, no spineless chiropractor, nor
>>>> unwelcomed poster around here.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MikeMike Date: Dec 26, 2007 11:53
On Dec 25, 3:04Â pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>> On Dec 25, 1:17 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>> On Dec 25, 1:00 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>>> On Dec 25, 12:40 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>> Carrie is not stupid and no amount of saying so from you will make
>>>>>>> it ...
|
| Show full article (2.67Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MikeMike Date: Dec 26, 2007 11:59
On Dec 25, 4:32Â pm, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 25, 4:17Â pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>> On Dec 25, 2:04 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>> On Dec 25, 1:17 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
|
| Show full article (4.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MikeMike Date: Dec 26, 2007 12:05
On Dec 25, 3:59Â pm, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 25, 3:43Â pm, Reality Scan gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Dec 25, 2:30 pm, Carrie yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> Â It didn't bother him to use personal emails from almost 6 years ago,
>>> written to someone else, posted (and reposted here) out of context,
>>> that had nothing to do with him OR this newsgroup, and still
>>> occasionally threatens to repost them and use them now.
>
>> ~Get a life, Starcheat! Â You got caught stirring shit with Sheryl,
>> wanted to argue about it, Lotus Gal wants to argue about it and now
>> its a shit storm.
>
>> Good work stirring shit.
>
> Â And, the result is, you have used Sheryl's post to create a long
> thread of negative and mean-spiritedness, which involve her. Even
> though she made the choice not to participate here anymore.
> Â But, I guess if she doesn't want her name used in this way she can ...
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Lotus_BloomLotus_Bloom Date: Dec 26, 2007 12:13
On Dec 26, 1:53Â pm, Mike aol.com> wrote:> On Dec 25, 3:04Â pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>> On Dec 25, 1:17 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>> On Dec 25, 1:00 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
|
| Show full article (2.98Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: CarrieCarrie Date: Dec 26, 2007 13:32
"Mike" aol.com> wrote in message
news:8abc4ea8-5012-4348-a6f8-5b30e86e5679@w56g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 25, 2:17 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>> On Dec 25, 1:00 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>> On Dec 25, 12:40 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>> Carrie is not stupid and no amount of saying so from you will make
>>>>> it
>>>>> that
>>>>> way. And Bill, you can fuck off too.
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Reality ScanReality Scan Date: Dec 26, 2007 13:47
On Dec 26, 3:32 pm, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:> "Mike" aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8abc4ea8-5012-4348-a6f8-5b30e86e5679@w56g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 25, 2:17 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>> On Dec 25, 1:00 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
|
| Show full article (2.47Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Lotus_BloomLotus_Bloom Date: Dec 26, 2007 13:59
On Dec 26, 3:47Â pm, Reality Scan netzero.com> wrote:> On Dec 26, 3:32 pm, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> "Mike" aol.com> wrote in message>
>
>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>> On Dec 25, 1:00 pm, "Lotus_Bloom" tx.rr.com> wrote:>>>>> "Reality Scan" gmail.com> wrote in message>
|
| Show full article (2.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
