|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 27, 2007 16:23
On Jul 27, 6:43 am, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for answering for Sheryl.
>
> One of the perks of building up a reputation in a certain way.
NOTICE Carrie:
YOUR Choice to jump in and make a snide remark at Sheryl's expense
YOUR Choice to aid and support the trolling of Sheryl, by two slime
ball trolls
MY and others Choice to see you as another slime ball troll, trolling
this newsgroup, based on YOUR Choice.
Sheryl's CHOICE NOT to respond to these slime ball remarks made by
slime ball trolls.
YOUR CHOICE to continuously WHINE about how people treat you based on
the CHOICES you make.
My and others CHOICE to see you as as an obnoxious, whining hypocrite
who complains she is not treated better than she treats others.
YOUR CHOICE to WHINE about the CHOICES YOU make, as though you are NOT
responsible for your CHOICES. MY and OTHERS CHOICE to confront you
with your slime ball lack of ethics and responsibility.
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 27, 2007 16:24
>>> How absurd is it for Katie's partner here
>>> to police the newsgroup for posting violations?
>
>> I realize the question is hypothetical because it assumes a role that
>> is not a fact.
>
>> They were questions and valid ones as far as I'm concerned. If you
>> don't have a problem with what sheryl does, fine. I'm just curious as
>> to why she's doing it in the manner she is.
>
> If you were "just curious" you wouldn't have
> posted your interrogation under the heading
> "What's you game, shameless? "
I wouldn't address the poster by the moniker they gave themselves? Is
that the issue? Or do you object to my characterization of what she's
doing a game? What is your problem?
|
| Show full article (4.54Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 27, 2007 16:31
On Jul 27, 5:57 pm, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:>>> That's all I've ever asked or expected of you. Grow
>>> up and step up.
>
>> You've ever asked or expected of Chuck?
>
> And she wonders why I refer to her as The Queen.
~~~Let's talk about promoting the feminization of Lee," because you
and "Chuck," have
been the feminazation of male posters on TRCM just as you have been
promoting stories -or let's use a better word, "interpretations,"
about this newsgroup, TRCM posters, your own credentials and
motivation as cult busters, and A Course in Miracles for years.
Now you and "Chuck," have every right to your opinions and
interpretations on these issues and persons, but neither you nor
"Chuck have the power to make sexually and religiously bigoted
language and commentary ethical or socially acceptable."
|
| Show full article (4.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 27, 2007 17:02
On Jul 27, 6:24 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:>>>> How absurd is it for Katie's partner here
>>>> to police the newsgroup for posting violations?
>
>>> I realize the question is hypothetical because it assumes a role that
>>> is not a fact.
>
>>> They were questions and valid ones as far as I'm concerned. If you
>>> don't have a problem with what sheryl does, fine. I'm just curious as
>>> to why she's doing it in the manner she is.
>
>> If you were "just curious" you wouldn't have
>> posted your interrogation under the heading
>> "What's you game, shameless? "
>
> I wouldn't address the poster by the moniker they gave themselves? Is
> that the issue? Or do you object to my characterization of what she's
> doing a game? What is your problem? ...
|
| Show full article (1.64Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Jul 27, 2007 17:38
> I've stated that I will disappoint your expectations when they're not
> mine.
And therein lies the Hell Her Hinenyness, Queen Lee Flynn, has created for
herself.
>
>by what hubris do you
> think your question has any meaning or significance to me?
I know, huh! Sheesh!! What a freak!
It's time for another Indoctrination Session. Maybe the new pub this time?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 27, 2007 17:55
On Jul 27, 8:38 pm, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:>> I've stated that I will disappoint your expectations when they're not
>> mine.
>
> And therein lies the Hell Her Hinenyness, Queen Lee Flynn, has created for
> herself.
>
>
>
>>by what hubris do you
>> think your question has any meaning or significance to me?
>
> I know, huh! Sheesh!! What a freak!
>
> It's time for another Indoctrination Session. Maybe the new pub this time?
|
| Show full article (0.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Jul 28, 2007 06:15
> On Jul 27, 8:38 pm, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:>>> I've stated that I will disappoint your expectations when they're not
>>> mine.
>>
>> And therein lies the Hell Her Hinenyness, Queen Lee Flynn, has created
>> for
>> herself.
>>
>>
>>
>>>by what hubris do you
>>> think your question has any meaning or significance to me?
>>
>> I know, huh! Sheesh!! What a freak! ...
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
