|
|
 Up |
  |
|
Author: SMVSMV Date: Jul 26, 2007 12:50
|
| |
|
| | 26 Comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 26, 2007 15:32
On Jul 26, 3:50 pm, "SMV" aol.com> wrote:
You take the time to let us know of your new creation, but require us
to go to your site? Why not simply copy it with your usual disclaimer
header?
Do you not want to discuss it and avoid being responsible for it?
Are you simply trying to generate traffic to your site? (You know,
Oprah's intro as "a budding author who also has a blog site with
thousands of hits a day")
Are you in competition with someone?
Are you looking for a sponsor?
Are you trying to skew where your blog shows up in a google search?
What?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: LeeLee Date: Jul 26, 2007 18:58
> On Jul 26, 3:50 pm, "SMV" aol.com> wrote:>
> You take the time to let us know of your new creation, but require us
> to go to your site? Why not simply copy it with your usual disclaimer
> header?
> Do you not want to discuss it and avoid being responsible for it?
> Are you simply trying to generate traffic to your site? (You know,
> Oprah's intro as "a budding author who also has a blog site with
> thousands of hits a day")
> Are you in competition with someone?...
|
| Show full article (1.41Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AA Date: Jul 26, 2007 22:26
Chuck wrote:
> On Jul 26, 3:50 pm, "SMV" aol.com> wrote:>
> You take the time to let us know of your new creation, but require us
> to go to your site? Why not simply copy it with your usual disclaimer
> header?
> Do you not want to discuss it and avoid being responsible for it?
> Are you simply trying to generate traffic to your site? (You know,
> Oprah's intro as "a budding author who also has a blog site with
> thousands of hits a day")
> Are you in competition with someone?
> Are you looking for...
|
| Show full article (1.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AA Date: Jul 26, 2007 22:27
Lee wrote:
> Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:>> On Jul 26, 3:50 pm, "SMV" aol.com> wrote:>> You take the time to let us know of your new creation, but require us
>> to go to your site? Why not simply copy it with your usual disclaimer
>> header?
>> Do you not want to discuss it and avoid being responsible for it?
>> Are you simply trying to generate traffic to your site? (You know,
>> Oprah's intro as "a budding author who also has a blog site with
>> thousands of hits a day")
>> Are you in competition with someone?
>> Are you looking for a sponsor?
>> Are you trying to skew where your blog shows up in a google search?
>> What?
>
> What's it to you, Chuck? Troll. You've got the ...
|
| Show full article (1.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DeborahDeborah Date: Jul 26, 2007 22:54
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:58:42 -0600, "Lee" <4given@ innocent.com> wrote:
>It's a -news- group. If you're going to address
>the signal-to-noise ratio on this ng, please start
>with your side of the fence.
You too, Lee. Because you spend a lot of time responding to the
trolls, but you've yet to respond to a very salient issue of mine. It
was addressed to maz, but it wasn't confined to maz. And I'm really
damned surprised that NOBODY has answered.
Seems you'd rather just go after the trolls with your beebee gun than
deal with real issues course students raise.
Deborah (BC)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Gene Ward SmithGene Ward Smith Date: Jul 26, 2007 22:59
Deborah noemail.com> wrote in
news:qv1ja31ka73tclcnj51rmdnrep12sil9m6@4ax.com:
> And I'm really
> damned surprised that NOBODY has answered.
>
My answer, for what it is worth, is I told you so. By that I mean I think
it is clear not releasing full scans of the notes isn't going to work.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 27, 2007 00:10
> Sheryl is extending the relationships that she has
> spent years building on this n.g., to keep us posted
> on what she's doing elsewhere.
Thanks for answering for Sheryl.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AA Date: Jul 27, 2007 00:29
Chuck wrote:
>> Sheryl is extending the relationships that she has
>> spent years building on this n.g., to keep us posted
>> on what she's doing elsewhere.
>
> Thanks for answering for Sheryl.
Thanks for trolling for Katie.
What a flaming asshole.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 27, 2007 01:33
On Jul 27, 3:29 am, A bcde.com> wrote:> Chuck wrote:
>
>>> Sheryl is extending the relationships that she has
>>> spent years building on this n.g., to keep us posted
>>> on what she's doing elsewhere.
>
>> Thanks for answering for Sheryl.
>
> Thanks for trolling for Katie.
I'm happy that you appreciate the effort as you see it. You are
welcome.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
