|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: TerraFreeNewsTerraFreeNews Date: Oct 6, 2007 20:24
"Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote in message
news:fe9go0$47i$2@aioe.org...> The energy or something on this ng seems to have changed, since the
> "great exodus" to get away from the evil trolls and shills for evil. It
> seems to be nicer, more peaceful in spite of those speaking their minds.
ROTFLMAO.
Energy change? Not likely. Katie and "Chuck," have no plans of going
anywhere.
Which means the Eots gals, Ellen and Debs are fresh meat for Katie. (Fresh
meat and acutally culties too!)
Which puts Carrie Starchild in the unenviable position of switching
allegience from Katie to Ellen and Debs,
New energy? Sure now, Carrie is has to generate a whole new pack of lies to
justfy her shifting alliance.
What this called? The Cult Re-Shuffle?
I hope you gal are ready for Katie. She don't like Cult Smirk Sisters.
Too, too funny
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Reality ScanReality Scan Date: Oct 6, 2007 23:47
On Oct 6, 7:34 pm, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:
> Yup, all us evil people here. Fascinating for civil, decent human
> beings to can't resist it.
ROTFLMAO
Did it ever occur to your little squirrel mind that so many people
dislike both you and Katie Dean because you are both nasty, no good,
SOB's?
Just testing the water for signs of intelligence.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: mazmaz Date: Oct 7, 2007 01:52
imho, honesty and integrity.
"deb_lotus_tx" sbcglobal.net> schreef in bericht
news:f0UNi.11522$JD.93@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...> What's this about Bill? deb
>
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: PieterPieter Date: Oct 7, 2007 03:57
"maz" rocketmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:fe8ong$s2g$1@aioe.org...> ROTFLMAO. You are asking this of Carrie?
>
> Boggles the mind N. always re-opens senseless, useless, annoying
> and overtly perverted threads with curry and bean.
> To be honest, that's the foremost reason to quit reading or posting here,
> for me. boggles the mind. maz
Hi Maz,
Imagine you were the therapist of Carrie.
(This is not so very absurd, since we are,
as followers of Jesus' Course, supposed to
supply the love we see is lacking.)
Then what is the content of the relationship
between therapist and patient? With the
knowledge that only an unforgiveness can
possibly give rise to sickness of any kind:
"The therapist sees in the patient all that he has
not forgiven in himself, and is thus given another
chance to look at it, open it to re-evaluation and
forgive it. When this occurs, he sees his sins as...
|
| Show full article (1.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mazmaz Date: Oct 7, 2007 04:37
> Maz, this third-person sniping you're doing
> boggles MY mind. This is NOT the Maz I've
> known for years, ...
Well, Nancy, how about answering direct
messages to you? It must have occurred to you that you
are constantly dodging my direct appeals. Now you
lament the indirect appeals.
you know, the maz you've known is a bit tired of
disruptions and constant enablement of structured
disruptions.
> I'll respond to anyone who introduces an
> actual course-related topic here,
|
| Show full article (1.41Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mazmaz Date: Oct 7, 2007 04:48
>
> Imagine you were the therapist of Carrie.
No thank you Pieter. I have no education and
no calling in the Atonement to be a therapist.
My specific tasks are somewhere else, and I
only accept the Holy Spirit as therapist.
> Wouldn't it be great to *accept*
> this complete reversal of thinking?
Answer this for yourself. You have no basis
to judge my acceptance or non-acceptance
of Course thought reversal. All I can tell you is that
your enablement of insanity doesn't appeal
to me as sane, nor holy, nor a particular
example of reversal of thinking. Your holier-
than-thou attitude isn't attractive either.
I'll wait for your therpeutic fruits to show.
Until then, good luck with your own
acceptance of thought reversal.
namazt
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Oct 7, 2007 05:42
"deb_lotus_tx" sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:h%%TNi.11521$JD.7919@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
woody's
Every word that ends in "s" does not need an apostrophe. In the interest of the English
language, which provides some of us with the ability to communicate effectively, apostrophes
denote possession. Plural words do not require apostrophes.
What you wrote denotes something that belongs to someone named "Woody" , which makes no sense in
the context.
No need to thank me, just kindly pass the information along,. as we are currently suffering from
an epidemic of inappropriate apostrophes.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Oct 7, 2007 05:44
"Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote in message news:fe95p4$5ra$6@aioe.org...>> Quit hanging on to my skirt little boy, if you want to talk about Wayne, email him you little
>> coward. So is this how you get your woody's but trying to trash women on the internet.
>> You're only ever talking about yourself. deb
>
> Maybe Wayne would like to come here and talk.
>
> That might be interesting.
John will kick his *ss again. John is mighty bad *ss, armed with Special super-powerful weapons
from God!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Oct 7, 2007 05:48
"TerraFreeNews" homail.com> wrote in message
news:47080ce5$0$26454$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...>
> "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote in message news:47080654$0$18968$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>>>> because you never actually compare your religious belief with mine --
>>> hell, you hide your religious beliefs and make them a "personal
>>> matter."
>>
>> Well geez, what would be the point of doing that? Gee, I explained numerous times why I
>> don't do it. One of the reasons is because it would be ridiculous beyond the pale to try to
>> prove that one superstition is any better than any other superstition, despite your concocted
>> idea that I'm doing so anyway.
>
> Oh, I see the argument from insanity --"We are all insane," you are just more insane than me."
Well gee, no, that's not what I said, John. Geez, why do you insist upon hearing things that
have never been said?
Gee, you're shadow boxing, (socially acceptable male equivalent of "cupcake".)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Oct 7, 2007 05:51
> On Oct 6, 3:02 pm, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:>>>>> What's wrong with this situation?
>>
>>>> You think that being disagreed with or having your assertions challenged is the same thing
>>>> as
>>>> being "trashed'. For that matter, you believe in being "trashed", which is against the
>>>> teachings of the Curse.
>>
>>> Really, Katie?
>>
>> Yes, really, John.
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
