>On May 3, 12:03 pm, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:
>

>>> Are you "playing innocent," Carrie? You never explained what you
>>> meant when you wrote that you would play innocent and ask a question.

>>
>> You have a post from this newsgroup, with full headers, date, and info
>> where I actually said this?
>> In context, in regard to this newsgroup?
>> And, did I say it about you?

>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>~Here's what Nancy wrote after reading your your emails to Katie Dean
>and you claiming what you wrote was not "all that terrible."
>
>"Carrie wrote:

>> Actually, I had reread the parts of the emails being reposted and
>> realized I hadn't written anything that terrible (or that different
>> from what's written on boards and I know others have also written in
>> private emails) Thus, in order to now go along with you and have peace,
>> as you suggest, I have to agree with you about the emails and that I
>> did something really wrong, joning with Katie in hate campaigns, or
>> even encouraging her to join me in this, which just isn't true.

>
>(Nancy replied:)
>
>All I read were the parts where you were writing about getting
>information about the foundation by cozying up to some and irritating
>others. They show incredible insight into the ways folk react to your
>various tactics, a confident control of these tactics and a malicious
>intent.
>
>Tbh, I had to stop reading. They made my skin crawl.
>
>n. "