|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 8, 2007 03:57
On Jul 7, 2:58 pm, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 7, 11:04 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:> On Jul 7, 10:58 am, "Lee" <4gi...@innocent.com> wrote:
>>>> You HATE being challenged or exposed. You act viciously
>>> to PUNISH anyone who stands up to you, or speaks out
>>> against your idiocy. (Our "spineless" chiropractor is guilty
>>> of one thing -- having the SPINE to stand up to your
>>> false bravado and b.s. So you go after her livelihood, like
>>> a common thug.)
>
> Let's see, Nancy, you tried me and now Sheryl. Who's next?
>
> ~~Gee, "Chuck," do you wish to pit your superior intelligence against
> mine?
The only one that has claimed superior intelligence is you. OK. you
can have this claim.
|
| Show full article (4.11Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 8, 2007 04:41
On Jul 8, 5:57 am, Chuck yahoo.com>>> ~~ Oh, you mean like wrapping your actions here as "cult busting"??
>> Gee, you never seem to apply to Katie Dean the same standards you
>> pontificate to others
>
> I am not here busting cults so your premise is invalid.
Really? Its not my premise is invalid, but rather you are dishonest
and cowardly liar.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 8, 2007 05:39
On Jul 8, 7:41 am, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 8, 5:57 am, Chuck yahoo.com>
>>>> ~~ Oh, you mean like wrapping your actions here as "cult busting"??
>>> Gee, you never seem to apply to Katie Dean the same standards you
>>> pontificate to others
>
>> I am not here busting cults so your premise is invalid.
>
> Really? Its not my premise is invalid, but rather you are dishonest
> and cowardly liar.
Evidence? If anyone is cowardly, that would be you for insisting that
my reason here has anything to do with busting cults. Liar, liar,
pants on fire. Grow up and act like an adult with the sense of
intellegence you claim because the evidence of it is getting scarcer
and scarcer. Sheesh.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 8, 2007 06:59
On Jul 7, 9:22 pm, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 7, 6:24 pm, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ~~ Gee. All in jest. Well, Chuck that unfortunately puts you in Katie
>> Dean as authors of volumes of posts which can be easily interpreted
>> differently.
>
> I am not responsible for and do not control what Katie posts. Deal
> with me.
>
> ~ You only have to deal with your post, "Chuck." You have plenty of
> posts affirming you are a cross-dresser
Are you familiar with the genre fiction? I hope so because I would
hate to think you take what you write seriously.
> while cheering on the attempts
> to portray other posters as cross dressers.
Here's an example of your fiction.
|
| Show full article (5.12Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 8, 2007 07:32
On Jul 7, 1:42 pm, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:
> You, Queenie, are full of shit, Chuck has you pegged, and if ever there was a blatent case of
> Projection, you are it. The sad thing is that it's beyond clear that you know what a pathetic
> jerk you are, since what else could inspire you to degrade yourself so in one lame attempt after
> another to blame the messenger?
I am beginning to understand the implications of Lee's advocation of
the "lucid dream" interpretation of ACIM. From Wiki, "During lucid
dreams, it is often possible to exert conscious control over the dream
characters and environment...".
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NancyNancy Date: Jul 8, 2007 08:38
On Jul 6, 6:21 am, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:>> If you look at a body not as a bag of skin,
>> but as a locus of identity, some pretty
>> heavy-duty beating is going on. (Or attempts
>> thereof.)
> Interesting, because this is the con-
> text of the now greatly distorted basball
> bat quote from me.
Oops. Sorry. I picked the wrong baseball
bat quote. I had forgotten there were so
many.
n.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NancyNancy Date: Jul 8, 2007 08:55
On Jul 8, 4:42 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:> On Jul 8, 12:25 am, Nancy wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jul 7, 10:04 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:>
>
>>>> You HATE being challenged or exposed. You act viciously
>>>> to PUNISH anyone who stands up to you, or speaks out
>>>> against your idiocy. (Our "spineless" chiropractor is guilty
>>>> of one thing -- having the SPINE to stand up to your
>>>> false bravado and b.s. So you go after her livelihood, like
>>>> a common thug.)
>>> Let's see, Nancy, you tried me
>>> and now Sheryl. Who's next?
> ...
|
| Show full article (0.97Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 8, 2007 08:58
On Jul 8, 7:39 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:> On Jul 8, 7:41 am, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 8, 5:57 am, Chuck yahoo.com>>
>>>> ~~ Oh, you mean like wrapping your actions here as "cult busting"??
>>>> Gee, you never seem to apply to Katie Dean the same standards you
>>>> pontificate to others
>
>>> I am not here busting cults so your premise is invalid.
>
>> Really? Its not my premise is invalid, but rather you are dishonest
>> and cowardly liar.
>
> Evidence?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 8, 2007 09:08
On Jul 8, 7:39 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Really? Its not my premise is invalid, but rather you are dishonest
>> and cowardly liar.
>
> Evidence?
~You're a nasty, dishonest shill who can't even admit he's a shill.
Your entire premise here including your anonymity is dishonest. If you
are looking for evidence,ask Katie Dean if you are her sycophant.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 8, 2007 09:33
On Jul 8, 12:08 pm, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 8, 7:39 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Really? Its not my premise is invalid, but rather you are dishonest
>>> and cowardly liar.
>
>> Evidence?
>
> ~You're a nasty, dishonest shill who can't even admit he's a shill.
> Your entire premise here including your anonymity is dishonest. If you
> are looking for evidence,ask Katie Dean if you are her sycophant.
This isn't evidence? It's another of your fabrications, and not a very
creative one. And you accuse me of dishonesty? LOL.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
