|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 7, 2007 13:56
On Jul 7, 1:18 pm, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:> "Chuck" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> On Jul 7, 1:18 pm, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:
There is nothing healthy or respectful about a dsyfunctional
destructive relationship, such as that which characterizes a cult. It
might contain certain isolated elements of a normal or healthy
interaction, but the underlying actuality is always that one is either
using or being used.
Really, Katie? What exactly is functional about you and Chuck pushing
your sexual practices and fetishes on people who do not share and have
no interest in your private sexual practices? What exactly does your
private sexual fetish for cross dressing men have to do with cults
other than your inappropriate public promotion of your private sexual
practices to others is what dysfunctional, unhealthy and abnormal
people do.
|
| Show full article (1.41Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 7, 2007 14:42
On Jul 7, 3:16 pm, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 7, 1:22 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> and full
>>> of yourself that it takes the blind eye of a Chuck to stomach
>>> an alliance with you.
>
>> What alliance specifically, Lee? How does that alliance work exactly?
>
>> If you notice, I don't get into the middle of business between two
>> adults.
>
> Sure you do Chuck. That's why your affinity for cross dressing is part
> of the on-going effort of Katie Dean to cross dress posters on this
> newsgroup.
>
> If there is no "alliance," then please explain how your private sexual
> practices became a part of Katie Dean's on going hate campaign? ...
|
| Show full article (2.77Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 7, 2007 15:08
On Jul 7, 2:39 pm, Katie yahoo.com> wrote:> On Jul 7, 2:22 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> and full
>>> of yourself that it takes the blind eye of a Chuck to stomach
>>> an alliance with you.
>
>> What alliance specifically, Lee? How does that alliance work exactly?
>
>> If you notice, I don't get into the middle of business between two
>> adults.
>
> This Queasy Queenly Pile really does seem to believe that TRCM is our
> Universe. We kjnow it's his, by the way he presumes the level of
> importance it has to both of us and our relationship.
|
| Show full article (1.61Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 7, 2007 15:24
On Jul 7, 4:42 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Obviously there is NO reason to telegraph, introduce and project your
>> and Dean's private sexual practices and fetishes on to other posters.
>> When you do so, and do so inappropriately and maliciously, this
>> constitutes an alliance to promote your sexual practices on others who
>> do not share and are not interested in your sexual practices.
>
> As I recall, the introduction of this topic in this place was your
doing.
~~Really? Well you are wrong. The pictures wouldn't have even merited
a remark if Katie Dean wasn't already using cross-dressing degradation
to skewer people on this newsgroup.
As I recall, there was a limited exchange on CF about this. As
> I recall, both Katie and I attempted explain ourselves here and state
> that it was a jest (which is the correct interpretation as far as I'm concerned).
|
| Show full article (1.51Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 7, 2007 15:37
On Jul 7, 5:08 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
> I haven't yet gone to your conclusion, but I can see your point based
> on the studies I've read about some people and their on-line presence, behaviors and addictions.
Right "Chuck." You have to look no further than yours and Katie Dean's
pushing your private sexual practices on posters here who do not share
any desire for cross-dressing and sexual humiliation games. One must
wonder if you neighbors and your local police are on to the sex and
character assassination games you play on the Internet.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 7, 2007 16:16
On Jul 7, 6:24 pm, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:
> ~~ Gee. All in jest. Well, Chuck that unfortunately puts you in Katie
> Dean as authors of volumes of posts which can be easily interpreted
> differently.
I am not responsible for and do not control what Katie posts. Deal
with me.
> The game of character assassination is NOT jest. You and
> Dean are being dismissed as either sexual addicts and possible
> deviates, or alternatively as character assassins using sexually
> bigoted language to skewer your targets.
Your dismissal means nothing to me, please dismiss me, pretty please.
> Now do you and Katie Dean want to wage an up hill battle disproving
> the charge you and Dean are sexual addicts and deviates despite your
> volumes of sexually deviant posts,
This is an example of your intellectual superiority and integrity? LOL
> or do you wish to play nice and get
> out of the character assassination game?
You are attempting to make me responsible for events that happened in
different spaces, at different times, in different contexts and a
connect the lines argument you have fabricated. I decline. If you...
|
| Show full article (2.02Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 7, 2007 18:22
On Jul 7, 6:24 pm, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:> ~~ Gee. All in jest. Well, Chuck that unfortunately puts you in Katie
> Dean as authors of volumes of posts which can be easily interpreted
> differently.
I am not responsible for and do not control what Katie posts. Deal
with me.
~ You only have to deal with your post, "Chuck." You have plenty of
posts affirming you are a cross-dresser while cheering on the attempts
to portray other posters as cross dressers.
> The game of character assassination is NOT jest. You and
> Dean are being dismissed as either sexual addicts and possible
> deviates, or alternatively as character assassins using sexually
> bigoted language to skewer your targets.
Your dismissal means nothing to me, please dismiss me, pretty please.
~~ Gee, "Chuck," it may not seem to mean much to an mean spirited
anonymous newsgroup troll, but the newsgroup subject has just morphed
from your claims that TRCM is a cult to the inappropriate sexual
promotions of your private sexual proclivities.
|
| Show full article (3.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NancyNancy Date: Jul 7, 2007 21:25
On Jul 7, 10:04 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:>> You HATE being challenged or exposed. You act viciously
>> to PUNISH anyone who stands up to you, or speaks out
>> against your idiocy. (Our "spineless" chiropractor is guilty
>> of one thing -- having the SPINE to stand up to your
>> false bravado and b.s. So you go after her livelihood, like
>> a common thug.)
> Let's see, Nancy, you tried me
> and now Sheryl. Who's next?
Did I miss something? Tried what?
n.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 8, 2007 03:42
On Jul 8, 12:25 am, Nancy wrote:
> On Jul 7, 10:04 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You HATE being challenged or exposed. You act viciously
>>> to PUNISH anyone who stands up to you, or speaks out
>>> against your idiocy. (Our "spineless" chiropractor is guilty
>>> of one thing -- having the SPINE to stand up to your
>>> false bravado and b.s. So you go after her livelihood, like
>>> a common thug.)
>> Let's see, Nancy, you tried me
>> and now Sheryl. Who's next?
>
> Did I miss something? Tried what?
>
> n.
Read the topic.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ellieellie Date: Jul 8, 2007 03:55
> Katie yahoo.com> wrote:>> ....
>> You're one of those people who should probably just shut up since you
>> feel so beat up on when your behaviors and assertions are challenged
>> that you have to organize creepy people into destructive little cults
>> and then run around inciting Hate Wars. Someone is bound to notice
>> these things sooner or later...
>
> 'More excellent advice directed squarely to -your- self.
>
> It could not describe behavior or her words,
> any less than it does. It couldn't describe yours any better.
>
> This is PRECISELY what you have been doing, since
> you were rejected by Peny and Jach. Read the paragraph
> again. YOU flip into creepy fits of anger every time YOU
> are challenged Katie, and you then work very very hard
> to incite hate wars as payback. - It's YOU who do this. -
> At the 'Lazaris C/S' board. At the 'Lazaris lite' board. ...
|
| Show full article (2.29Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
