On Jul 7, 12:04 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:

On Jul 7, 1:07 pm, Katie yahoo.com> wrote:

You know Your Hineyness, I don't pay much attention to these hysterical shaming attempts of
yours, because I realize that you are addicted to spewing these guilt and humiliation endeavors,
so they must be trotted out against someone on a predictable schedule. In fact, they embarass
me for you, as I'm sure they do anyone who would honestly strive or hope to afford you any
modicum of credibility or respect, if for no other reason than to hold out hope for humanity.
Naturally, that doesn't apply to your fellow culties here, who are as happy to secretly sneer
down their noses in disdain for you as you are them.

But, since Chuck reposted this most recent explosion I thought I'd respond to this blatent piece
of garbage and direct you to my 5 odd year history of not only tolerating being "stood up to",
spoken out against, insulted, and even threatened, but where I continue to host the full history
of it, to the much expressed and great appreciation of not a few very decent and sincere people.

Katie yahoo.com> wrote:

'More excellent advice directed squarely to -your- self.

It could not describe behavior or her words,
any less than it does. It couldn't describe yours any better.

This is PRECISELY what you have been doing, since
you were rejected by Peny and Jach. Read the paragraph
again. YOU flip into creepy fits of anger every time YOU
are challenged Katie, and you then work very very hard
to incite hate wars as payback. - It's YOU who do this. -
At the 'Lazaris C/S' board. At the 'Lazaris lite' board.
At your own board at CosmicFool. And here.

Um...a LOT of really funny, clever and astute stuff about the damage
ACIM does, and the damaged people who are attracted to it?

On Jul 7, 1:52 pm, "Lee" <4gi...@innocent.com> wrote:

Sounds like you're the one who's having the problem, Your Grotesque
Greasiness. Get help if you need it, your hubris has nothing to do
with me.

ACIM has failed you miserably. Thanks for the proof in living
color!

"Chuck" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1183830126.175717.164310@c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

Oh well, so much for my smothering influence over you!!

I don't actually believe that there is no collusion between them because they denied a specific
allegation. Both of them are masters at contempt and malicious abuse of the letter of the law.
But that doesn't change the fact that they use each other, in fact, the idea that they just go
right ahead and do it without need of any discussion or permission only reinforces my
understanding of the strategic nature of their sick relationship.

On Jul 7, 1:52 pm, "Lee" <4gi...@innocent.com> wrote:

What alliance specifically, Lee? How does that alliance work exactly?

If you notice, I don't get into the middle of business between two
adults.

On Jul 7, 2:22 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:

This Queasy Queenly Pile really does seem to believe that TRCM is our
Universe. We kjnow it's his, by the way he presumes the level of
importance it has to both of us and our relationship.

Of Curse, we're not meant to notice his distorted visions of our
lives, minds, and stomach content , but simply to admire, respect, and
genuflect on cue!

On Jul 7, 11:04 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:

Let's see, Nancy, you tried me and now Sheryl. Who's next?

~~Gee, "Chuck," do you wish to pit your superior intelligence against
mine?

You may think using others in the manner that you do is a good thing
because you wrap it in a "cause statement" that appears noble.

~~ Oh, you mean like wrapping your actions here as "cult busting"??
Gee, you never seem to apply to Katie Dean the same standards you
pontificate to others?

On Jul 7, 1:22 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:

Sure you do Chuck. That's why your affinity for cross dressing is part
of the on-going effort of Katie Dean to cross dress posters on this
newsgroup.

If there is no "alliance," then please explain how your private sexual
practices became a part of Katie Dean's on going hate campaign?