|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: LeeLee Date: Jul 3, 2007 10:40
Hate-writer Katie Dean Vollmer continues her falsified
and dishonest reporting to this list..
What follows is another bald-faced LIE. She lies easily,
often and apparently without the least compunction.
IOW, Katie lies at will.
+++++++++++++
From: "Katie" yahoo.com>
Subject: Holey Nancy's Pure Contempt - See It Here!
Date: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 11:13 AM
"Nancy" wrote in message
> .... According to your Dear Friend and Co-Cult
> Indoctrinator, Queenie Lee Flynn it's a noble and kind thing to alert
> those we might know or have heard of
> once about our internet activities.
+++++++++++++
|
| Show full article (1.42Kb) |
|
| | 278 Comments |
|
|
Author: NancyNancy Date: Jul 6, 2007 00:15
On Jul 4, 8:26 pm, Deborah noemail.com> wrote:> On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 01:09:34 -0000, Robin gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>>You be the judge of my thinking and if I am in error please don't
>>hesitate to correct me... :))
>
> Okay Robin, here's a very elementary example of your level confusion:
>
> " But I guess as long as
> you need a body to beat on, Katie will make herself available"
>
> We're on the internet, Robin. Nobody's body is getting beat on.
>
> Deborah (BC)
If you look at a body not as a bag of skin,
but as a locus of identity, some pretty
heavy-duty beating is going on. (Or attempts
thereof.)
|
| Show full article (0.64Kb) |
|
| | 66 Comments |
|
|
Author: NancyNancy Date: Jul 6, 2007 00:21
On Jul 5, 4:44 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:> On Jul 5, 6:11 pm, Deborah noemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:00:36 -0700, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:>>>On Jul 5, 5:50 pm, Tera Free Nws gmail.com> wrote:>>>> On Jul 5, 4:38 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:>
>
>>>>>>>>> Hate-writer Katie Dean Vollmer continues her falsified and dishonest
>>>>>>>>> reporting to this list..
>
>>>>>>>>> What follows is another bald-faced LIE. She lies easily, often and
>>>>>>>>> apparently without the least compunction.
>
>>>>>>>>> IOW, Katie lies at will. ...
|
| Show full article (4.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 6, 2007 02:25
On Jul 6, 3:21 am, Nancy wrote:
> On Jul 5, 4:44 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:>> I am simply applying the definition of the word. I'll use Miriam
>> Webster to illustrate:
>
>> lie:
>> 1 a : an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker to
>> be
>> untrue with intent to deceive b : an untrue or inaccurate statement
>> that may or may not be believed true by the speaker
>> 2 : something that misleads or deceives
>
>> I'll focus on definitions 1b and 2. A hyperbole is an inaccurate
>> statement by the definition of hyperbole (extravagant exaggeration).
>> Therefore definition 1b applies. Since you see it as a hyperbole,
>> definition 2 doesn't apply, but someone that doesn't recognize it as a
>> hyperbole may be mislead or deceived and therefore definition 2 would
>> apply would also apply for them.
>
> Are you classifying "lie" and "hyperbole" ...
|
| Show full article (1.23Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Jul 6, 2007 04:44
>
> If you look at a body not as a bag of skin,
> but as a locus of identity, some pretty
> heavy-duty beating is going on. (Or attempts
> thereof.)
By whom? Have you made any heavy-duty attempts to beat on anyone yourself, Holey Nance?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Jul 6, 2007 05:21
>
> If you look at a body not as a bag of skin,
> but as a locus of identity, some pretty
> heavy-duty beating is going on. (Or attempts
> thereof.)
>
Interesting, because this is the context of the now greatly distorted basball bat quote from me.
It was inspired by this authoritarian condescension from you:
"I think the important thing to remember is that what ego is
experiencing
and reacting to IS NOT REAL. Ego may well perceive
itself as attacked; it may well perceive itself as attacking -- but it
is incapable of REALLY participating in attack/defense, because all it
is doing is thrashing about in its dream. As long as one is determined
to see himself/herself as embattled or at odds, he/she will experience
this and it will seem important to him/her. But it isn't real. "
and then you went on to say:
|
| Show full article (3.59Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NancyNancy Date: Jul 6, 2007 09:40
On Jul 6, 3:25 am, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:> On Jul 6, 3:21 am, Nancy wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jul 5, 4:44 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:>>> I am simply applying the definition of the word. I'll use Miriam
>>> Webster to illustrate:
>
>>> lie:
>>> 1 a : an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker to
>>> be
>>> untrue with intent to deceive b : an untrue or inaccurate statement
>>> that may or may not be believed true by the speaker
>>> 2 : something that misleads or deceives
>
>>> I'll focus on definitions 1b and 2. A hyperbole is an inaccurate
>>> statement by the definition of hyperbole (extravagant exaggeration). ...
|
| Show full article (1.37Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Gene Ward SmithGene Ward Smith Date: Jul 6, 2007 10:26
> Are you classifying "lie" and "hyperbole"
> as two distinct, and mutually exclusive,
> forms?
>
It seems to me he's doing just the opposit
--he;s classifying hyperbole as
a lie. Camels, after all, don't really fit through the eyes of needles.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: LeeLee Date: Jul 7, 2007 07:58
Recap: Katie Dean Vollmer is fond of sharing her baseball bat
fantasies with her fantasized victims, such as in this trc-m post
written to Nancy:
"Hey, Nance, I wonder if you'd like to meet me in a dark
alley.... I wouldn't mind indulging my fantasies about taking
a few whacks at one of you holey people with a big stick.
Do you bleed when you're not being harmed by someone
smashing a baseball bat into your head?" ~ Katie Aug 2003
Nancy this week offered a quote of Katie "joking" about dark
alleys and baseball bats. It was the the wrong Katie-quote
about dark alleys and baseball bats.. written to Carrie
instead of to Nancy, years ago.
Katie offered yet another baseball bat 'joke' directed at Nancy
from the archives, and claimed THAT quote was the source
of the "now greatly-distorted" bat comment of hers. She also
claimed Nancy had "falsely accused" her of the very un-funny
quote directed at Carrie, in order to "incite hatred" toward her.
LOL.
|
| Show full article (5.29Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 7, 2007 09:04
> You HATE being challenged or exposed. You act viciously
> to PUNISH anyone who stands up to you, or speaks out
> against your idiocy. (Our "spineless" chiropractor is guilty
> of one thing -- having the SPINE to stand up to your
> false bravado and b.s. So you go after her livelihood, like
> a common thug.)
Let's see, Nancy, you tried me and now Sheryl. Who's next? You may
think using others in the manner that you do is a good thing because
you wrap it in a "cause statement" that appears noble. But using...
|
| Show full article (1.23Kb) |
| 41 Comments |
|
|
|
|
