Dishonest reporter, hate writer and fanatic Katie Dean Vollmer
continues her character assassination with this installment of her
five year long, obsessive campaign to smear Nancy's reputation..

You have authored over -950 !- messages to this list with
Nancy's *full name* in subject headers composed specifically
to publically harass her and smear her good name. You have
written another several thousand more whose demonstrable
intent was to harass, intimidate, slander and denigrate.

You don't get a free pass here anymore for your stalking
activity Katie. I will take the time to create a collection
featuring a gallery of what has spilled out of your very sick
mind toward Nancy, if you'd like. It will include your public
declarations of your immediate, irrational contempt toward
her *within minutes* of your first online exchange with her,
and your published intent to harass her relentlessly and make
her regret the very day she crossed your path (starting with
the celebrated roots of your Nancy-obsession at your personal
discussion list at cosmicidiocy.nut).

Do you think you will ever be able to forgive her, for what you believe
she's done to Nancy?

Do you believe that some are really unforgiveable, like totally outside the
Sonship and unworthy of our love, or maybe even compassion? Is Attack, and
seeing "the past" (as an excuse for attack) ever justified?

Asking from the point of possible course discussion, or how you are
relating what you wrote here to A Course in Miracles and what it says.

I'm trying to learn.

"Lee" <4given@innocent.com> wrote in message
news:0ZqdnY1i9b1kx53anZ2dnUVZ_tSknZ2d@giganews.com...

Carrie wrote:

Liar. If you were trying to learn you
would quit saying one thing while you
were doing the exact opposite, dummy.

Carrie wrote:

Oh the dripping irony. This from the
poster who's been playing the victim
card in almost every post of hers. I
just can't believe your head doesn't
-explode- from cognitive dissonance.

Group: talk.religion.course-miracle Date: Sun, Sep 30, 2007, 10:57pm
From: starchild@kingcon.com (Carrie)
CARRIE TO LEE (for 1000+ times)  
Do you think you will ever be able to forgive her, for what you believe
she's done to Nancy?
  Do you believe that some are really unforgiveable, like totally
outside the Sonship and unworthy of our love, or maybe even compassion?
Is Attack, and seeing "the past" (as an excuse for attack) ever
justified?
  Asking from the point of possible course discussion, or how you
are relating what you wrote here to A Course in Miracles and what it
says.

= = = = = = =
~~Trying is not the way to get something
done. Just do it! The more you throw
questions OUT to others, the further you
are from learning the lessons God would
have you learn. I am not making this
teaching up! It is basic Truth, found in ...

"A" bcd.net> wrote in message
news:PZCdnX15Recw-53anZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@comcast.com...

"A" bcd.net> wrote in message
news:PZCdnX15Recw-53anZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@comcast.com...

On Oct 1, 5:56 am, kenar...@webtv.net wrote:

LOL. Read Carrie's email to Dean. Its the same spiritual scam. Bait
and attack spiritual people then argue reacting at all to bait and
attack makes these people hypocrites.

But then again to make this scam even seem to work, these idiots have
to act maliciously, unethically and an in morally repugnant manner,
while lying their a** off, about what they are doing.

Religious baiting is universally considered unethical. In many
countries religious baiting is a hate crime.

On Sep 30, 10:27 pm, "Lee" <4gi...@innocent.com> wrote:

This has few references to Cyberstalking other than the Katie Dean
articles and the 1999 report to the VP. Of interest in the VP report
is the following:

Although there is no universally accepted definition of cyberstalking,
the term is used in this report to refer to the use of the Internet, e-
mail, or other electronic communications devices to stalk another
person. Stalking generally involves harassing or threatening behavior
that an individual engages in repeatedly, *such as following a person,
appearing at a person's home or place of business, making harassing
phone calls, leaving written messages or objects, or vandalizing a
person's property.* Most stalking laws require that the perpetrator
make a credible threat of violence against the victim; others include
threats against the victim's immediate family; and still others
require only that the alleged stalker's course of conduct constitute
an implied threat.

...
Actual Cyberstalking Incidents
In the first successful prosecution under California's new
cyberstalking law, prosecutors in the Los Angeles District Attorney's
Office obtained a guilty plea from a...

From North Carolina's statute: 'Unlawful to..

" 2.. Electronically mail or electronically communicate
to another repeatedly, *whether or not conversation
ensues*, for the purpose of abusing, annoying,
threatening, terrifying, harassing, or embarrassing
any person. "

Let's see Chuck..

Electronic communication. -Check.

Repeated. -Check.

Abusing, annoying, threatening, terrifying, harassing
or embarassing any person. -Check.

What _reasonable_ person

who finds themselves the butt of 4 or five thousand
scurrilous attacks and seething hate 'n smear messages
WITHOUT CAUSE OR REASON of any sort..

from a vile, unhinged zealot with a 5 year vendetta over
some passing comment on some distant discussion list..

that somehow, some way the zealot..