> On Aug 11, 9:58 pm, "Carrie"
kingcon.com> wrote:>> "Deborah"
noemail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:msrsb3lm2o0kn33qppb9esn65qi919lqel@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:13:33 -0400, "gig"
lycos.com> wrote:>>
>>>>"One"
nospam.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:egqsb319edon85m33h1oc6am1bt326o1k2@4ax.com...>>>>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:27:30 GMT, Gene Ward Smith
>>>>>
chewbacca.org> wrote:>>
>>
>>>>>>> When you become my captain, I will follow your orders. Until then,
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> are stuck with my "sneers". Soar beyond illusion, the unwary soul
>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>> fails to grapple with the mocking demons of illusion will return to
>>>>>>> the illusion as a slave of Illusion.
>>
>>>>>>There's a concept you seem to be unfamiliar with, namely that Usenet
>>>>>>groups
>>>>>>are interest groups for particular topics. Any theistic group is an
>>>>>>inappropriate place to play the language games which would be
>>>>>>entirely
>>>>>>appropriate on alt.atheism, such as making God a lower-case word and
>>>>>>surrounding it by scare quotes. By doing that, you spit on people's
>>>>>>beliefs
>>>>>>*in their own group*. That is religious bigotry. You are a bigot,
>>>>>>therefore, and should amend your behavior.
>>
>>>>> What happens when one doesn't see this newsgroup as theistic?
>>
>>>>Then one needs better glasses.
>>
>>> I agree. ACIM is all about the correcting the "authority problem",
>>> and you can't correct it without some concept of an "author of
>>> reality" other than yourself. That is basically what God is, per
>>> ACIM. The author of reality. First cause, creator, representative of
>>> absolute truth.
>>
>>> Deborah (BC
>>
>> You are saying that one person can and should "correct" what they see
>> as
>> faults, like authority problem in someone else?
>
> ~Are you saying this? And if not why are constantly finding fault? I
> mean do you have a reason other than being a hypocrite? Or does it
> just give you a feeling of power to accuse other what you do?
>
> I think your belief in relative truth has you thinking like a Nazi.
>
I think it's impossible to have any kind of a for-real discussion with
you, about ACIM or anything.
And, yes, this is how I see it.
>>
>> I always felt what the course tells us we should look for, be
>> vigiliant
>> for, and maybe even correct is in "ourself". And if we do, we reap the
>> benefits and if we don't we reap the benefits too (LOL)
>>
>> Actually, it says only one ego can see faults in another ego.
>>
>> Would Holy Spirit (or a mind aligned with this) see anything other
>> than
>> perfection and Love?
>
>
