|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: PieterPieter Date: Jan 22, 2008 00:31
> Would you want others to achieve the knowledge you now have since you
> began your study of ACIM?
Hi Katie,
My answer is: yes.
Though the initiative in achieving it
always is with anyone him/herself; it always
is one's own responsibility. (Someone else's
initiative isn't mine, so "converting others"
makes no sense!) If the initiative is there,
all help will be present.
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: PieterPieter Date: Jan 22, 2008 00:31
gmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:bc80216e-83c2-4356-92d4-39de6f757f05@m34g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
Anyone else? I thought it to be a pretty simple question, but I guess
it does require a commitment to something, so I realize the problem.
-.-.-. It is a simple question;
what "commitment" are you aiming at;
what would be the "problem" in its respect?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: thulathula Date: Jan 22, 2008 04:03
On Jan 22, 7:31Â pm, "Pieter" wrote:
> gmail.com> schreef in berichtnews:bc80216e-83c2-4356-92d4-39de6f757f05@m34g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Anyone else? Â I thought it to be a pretty simple question, but I guess
> it does require a commitment to something, so I realize the problem.
>
> -.-.-. It is a simple question;
> Â Â Â Â what "commitment" are you aiming at;
> Â Â Â Â what would be the "problem" in its respect?--------
> Would you want others to achieve the knowledge you now have since you
> began your study of ACIM?
|
| Show full article (3.23Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: HappyHappy Date: Jan 22, 2008 04:57
On Jan 21, 8:46Â am, Katie yahoo.com> wrote:> Would you want others to achieve the knowledge you now have since you
> began your study of ACIM?
Absolutely!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you Katie, for asking a very important question!
~ HappyD
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Jan 22, 2008 06:17
"A Scientologist can be defined by their answer to a single
question:
"Would you want others to achieve the knowledge you now have."
Tom Cruise blathering on like an arrogant schizophrenic hyena on meth
reminded me of you Assholeys, that's why I asked.
http://gawker.com/5002269/the-cruise-indoctrination-video-scientology-tried-to-s...
At least a Scientologist is expected to be able to answer a simple
question with a simple response. That's gotta be a plus!!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: thulathula Date: Jan 22, 2008 06:49
On Jan 23, 1:17Â am, Katie yahoo.com> wrote:> "A Scientologist can be defined by their answer to a single
> question:
>
> "Would you want others to achieve the knowledge you now have."
>
> Tom Cruise blathering on like an arrogant schizophrenic hyena on meth
> reminded me of you Assholeys, that's why I asked.
>
> http://gawker.com/5002269/the-cruise-indoctrination-video-scientology...
>
> At least a Scientologist is expected to be able to answer a simple
> question with a simple response. Â That's gotta be a plus!!
So glad to see you wrote one non-dictionaried word with a capitl
letter.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MikeMike Date: Jan 22, 2008 07:37
On Jan 21, 4:18Â pm, "Cletus" gmai.com> wrote:> "gig" lycos.com> wrote in message
>
> news:NYidnVELEaPznAjanZ2dnUVZ_v2pnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Would you want others to achieve the knowledge you now have since you
>>> began your study of ACIM?
>
>> You don't have to "achieve" anything. The knowledge is already there,
>> waiting for all of us, like an infinite database, just waiting to be a
>> accessed. We access it by removing the blocks to accessing it and it there
>> for us, whatever part of it we need, whenever we need it. This database,
>> or knowledge, is nothing less than pure love... and yes, I would want
>> others to have it. But ultimately it's not up to me, it's up to them.
>
> Right on Gig.
>
> The last sentence does not reflect the experience here. Ultimately volition ...
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MikeMike Date: Jan 22, 2008 08:26
On Jan 21, 5:11Â pm, "gig" lycos.com> wrote:> "Cletus" gmai.com> wrote in messagenews:fn3289$vsb$1@aioe.org...
>>> "gig" lycos.com> wrote in message
>>news:NYidnVELEaPznAjanZ2dnUVZ_v2pnZ2d@comcast.com...>>>> Would you want others to achieve the knowledge you now have since you
>>>> began your study of ACIM?
>
>>> You don't have to "achieve" anything. The knowledge is already there,
>>> waiting for all of us, like an infinite database, just waiting to be
>>> accessed. We access it by removing the blocks to accessing it and it's
>>> there for us, whatever part of it we need, whenever we need it. This
>>> database, or knowledge, is nothing less than pure love... and yes, I
>>> would want others to have it. But ultimately it's not up to me, it's up
>>> to them.
>
>> Right on Gig.
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.81Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MikeMike Date: Jan 22, 2008 08:29
On Jan 21, 11:46Â am, Katie yahoo.com> wrote:> Would you want others to achieve the knowledge you now have since you
> began your study of ACIM?
Not a well posed question. Others already possess the same
knowledge I have. Pick a different direct object to make the
question answerable in terms of ACIM if you really want an
answer which I doubt given your history.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: KatieKatie Date: Jan 22, 2008 09:55
On Jan 22, 11:29Â am, Mike yahoo.com> wrote:
> Â Pick a different direct object to make the
> Â question answerable in terms of ACIM.
I speak English, not ACIMese Cult Speak, which changes routinely with
each shuffle of the Cult.
Redefining words from the dictionary meaning to Special and Important
meanings that make the Culties smugly nod your heads because only you
**really** know what they mean is called Loading the Language. It's
one criteria by which we identify a destructive cult.
The question is extremely straightforward. If you can't understand
it or answer it because you're in a destructive ACIM cult, you should
get out of that cult immediately.
What I'm getting from these responses is that you're all afraid to
answer a simple question because you don't want to be responsible for
the answer. You're scared of being criticized.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
