| Re: Everybody lies, even Lee (we just can't find any ;) |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: talk.religion.coursemiracle · Group Profile
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Jul 6, 2007 02:25
On Jul 6, 3:21 am, Nancy wrote:
> On Jul 5, 4:44 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I am simply applying the definition of the word. I'll use Miriam
>> Webster to illustrate:
>
>> lie:
>> 1 a : an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker to
>> be
>> untrue with intent to deceive b : an untrue or inaccurate statement
>> that may or may not be believed true by the speaker
>> 2 : something that misleads or deceives
>
>> I'll focus on definitions 1b and 2. A hyperbole is an inaccurate
>> statement by the definition of hyperbole (extravagant exaggeration).
>> Therefore definition 1b applies. Since you see it as a hyperbole,
>> definition 2 doesn't apply, but someone that doesn't recognize it as a
>> hyperbole may be mislead or deceived and therefore definition 2 would
>> apply would also apply for them.
>
> Are you classifying "lie" and "hyperbole"
> as two distinct, and mutually exclusive,
> forms?
>
> n
I don't understand the question, two distinct forms of what? As I
wrote, "A hyperbole is an inaccurate statement by the definition of
hyperbole (extravagant exaggeration). Therefore definition 1b
applies." There is no exclusion using the definitions cited.
|