> "george" hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6ba0bc04-3791-415c-9420-b942939ebf91@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr...

> I'm not failing. I'm on the road and it takes effort. Lots of effort.
> Many times I have to try and try again. If I was perfect I would walk
> on water but that is not today! My last day on earth will be the day
> I'm perfect but I'm happy to be heading in the right direction toward
> my true self as it is uncovered to me.

> Thank you so much for posting this. It was awesome!
>

> On Apr 2, 10:45 am, george hotmail.com> wrote:
>

>> I'm not failing. I'm on the road and it takes effort. Lots of effort.
>> Many times I have to try and try again. If I was perfect I would walk
>> on water but that is not today! My last day on earth will be the day
>> I'm perfect but I'm happy to be heading in the right direction toward
>> my true self as it is uncovered to me.

>
> Then why did you start this thread?   You Assholeys are all the same,
> you love to prance and preach, promise and claim,  but when it comes
> down to any evidence, proof, or slight indication to support your
> assertions, suddenly it's a whole different story.  That's how cons
> are run, are you aware of that?
>
> Are you a con-man "George"...

> On Apr 2, 11:55 am, george hotmail.com> wrote:> Thank you so much for posting this. It was awesome!
>
> What's awesome about it?  Have you verified that it's true?  If it is,
> how come all ACIMheads aren't healthy, happy, rich and successful?
>
> I can send you a lot of AMWAY success stories too.  Are you going to
> join up?    Scientology makes many claims too, and it does in fact,
> have many healthy, happy, rich and successful followers.  How come
> you're not a Scientologist?
>
> How does this story prove anything about ACIM or anything else, for
> that matter?

> On Apr 2, 10:08 am, Katie yahoo.com> wrote:
>

>> On Apr 2, 10:45 am, george hotmail.com> wrote:

>

>>> I'm not failing. I'm on the road and it takes effort. Lots of effort.
>>> Many times I have to try and try again. If I was perfect I would walk
>>> on water but that is not today! My last day on earth will be the day
>>> I'm perfect but I'm happy to be heading in the right direction toward
>>> my true self as it is uncovered to me.

>

>> Then why did you start this thread?   You Assholeys are all the same,
>> you love to prance and preach, promise and claim,  but when it comes
>> down to any evidence, proof, or slight indication to support your
>> assertions, suddenly it's a whole different story.  That's how cons
>> are run, are you aware of that?

>

>> Are you a con-man "George"?

>
> I'm just a man doing my best. ...

>On Apr 2, 6:30 am, Deborah pumpetypump.com> wrote:

>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:12:10 -0700 (PDT), george
>>
>>
>>
>> hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>This is part of a post I did earlier...

> On Apr 1, 9:12 pm, george hotmail.com> wrote:
>

>> Why EVER respond to another's what they think are attacks.

>
> If you saw an attack, that was your thought. If you saw someone
> thinking that they were attacking you, that was also your thought, and
> neither have anything to do with actuality.  Studying or claiming or
> pretending to study ACIM doesn't make you a mind reader, but it does
> require you to indulge in that offensive behavior nevertheless.  You
> might want to stop that, it can become a nasty habit, and it's not
> very speeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerithual.
>
> You are stuck in an Infinity Loop of Ignorance, george. Every
> "benefit" you think you've gotten from ACIM is some kind of a mindfuck
> you're playing on yourself.
>
> The FACT that you see this post as me thinking I'm attacking you is
> evidence enough of that.
> ...

> On Apr 2, 8:53 am, Katie yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>

>> On Apr 1, 9:12 pm, george hotmail.com> wrote:

>

>>> Why EVER respond to another's what they think are attacks.

>

>> If you saw an attack, that was your thought. If you saw someone
>> thinking that they were attacking you, that was also your thought, and
>> neither have anything to do with actuality.  Studying or claiming or
>> pretending to study ACIM doesn't make you a mind reader, but it does
>> require you to indulge in that offensive behavior nevertheless.  You
>> might want to stop that, it can become a nasty habit, and it's not
>> very speeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerithual.

>

>> You are stuck in an Infinity Loop of Ignorance, george. Every
>> "benefit" you think you've gotten from ACIM is some kind of a mindfuck
>> you're playing on yourself. ...

> Deborah pumpetypump.com> wrote innews:d7n6v3p5c28aolp193jvca0grh26btscd6@4ax.com:
>

>> Our self-image (ego) is always beneath the truth.  It doesn't do much
>> good to try to raise it up a notch.  

>
> It's an idea with a lot of problems, but there are things which need doing.
> We need to associate our ego with our soul/spirit, not easy as they are not
> in communication. "I cannot guide your egos EXCEPT as you associate them with
> your Souls." This association allows the ego to become Christ-controlled,
> removing that burden from us.
>
> The ego as such cannot be made into something good, and saved in that way,
> but it can be trained. And once relinquished, even that part of our thought
> is brought into eternity in purified form.
>
> "The ego IS a contradiction. Man's self and God's Self ARE in opposition.
> They are opposed in creation, in will, and in outcome. They are fundamentally
> irreconcilable because the Soul cannot perceive, and the ego cannot know.
> They are therefore NOT IN COMMUNICATION, and can never BE in communication. ...