> I sent you something at the email address on file here and it came
> back undelievered.
> Thanks,
> George

>On May 7, 12:07 pm, george hotmail.com> wrote:

>> I sent you something at the email address on file here and it came
>> back undelievered.
>> Thanks,
>> George

>
>Which Deb?

> On Wed, 7 May 2008 10:12:09 -0700 (PDT), Lotus_Bloom
>
> tx.rr.com> wrote:

>>On May 7, 12:07 pm, george hotmail.com> wrote:

>>> I sent you something at the email address on file here and it came
>>> back undelievered.
>>> Thanks,
>>> George

>

>>Which Deb?

>
> Probably me since you have a valid email address and I do not.

> Since the claim is that Holey Nancy was harmed by Carrie but the Actuality is that Holey Nancy
> turned on Carrie after becoming Loopy Lopez's favorite person to obsessively spew at.  The
> Personal Secretary to Jesus needed to divert the mangy pitbull elsewhere, so Carrie became the
> doggy  bone.   Not even Carrie wants to admit this Fact, but it's all here in the archives.
>
> Below are a few of Holey Nancy's first responses to the posting of the e-mails that she later
> agreed did harm her:  More to come.   Make sure to ignore the proof, and just Carrie on
> hypocritically finger-pointing and pretending I don't substantiate what I have to say, like the
> good little Hate Lemmings you Culties-in-Denial Actually Are!
>
> Newsgroups: talk.religion.course-miracle
> From: "Nancy Lorieau"
> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:06:02 GMT
> Local: Tues, Nov 25 2003 4:06 pm
> Subject: Re: Carrie scams Tom with false ID and searches for Nancy's secret board
> Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message |
> Find messages by this author
>
> They both save emails and message group postings. The difference is that ...

>On May 7, 11:06 am, Deborah pumpetypump.com> wrote:

>> On Wed, 7 May 2008 10:12:09 -0700 (PDT), Lotus_Bloom
>>
>> tx.rr.com> wrote:

>>>On May 7, 12:07 pm, george hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>> I sent you something at the email address on file here and it came
>>>> back undelievered.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> George

>>

>>>Which Deb?

>>
>> Probably me since you have a valid email address and I do not.

>
>yes you :) Can I not send you anything? You don't have a valid email
>address?

> On Wed, 7 May 2008 11:09:14 -0700 (PDT), george
>
>
>
>
>
> hotmail.com> wrote:

>>On May 7, 11:06 am, Deborah pumpetypump.com> wrote:

>>> On Wed, 7 May 2008 10:12:09 -0700 (PDT), Lotus_Bloom

>

>>> tx.rr.com> wrote:

>>>>On May 7, 12:07 pm, george hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>> I sent you something at the email address on file here and it came
>>>>> back undelievered.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> George

>

>>>>Which Deb?

> ...

>On May 7, 11:58 am, Deborah pumpetypump.com> wrote:

>> On Wed, 7 May 2008 11:09:14 -0700 (PDT), george
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>On May 7, 11:06 am, Deborah

> On Wed, 7 May 2008 12:05:45 -0700 (PDT), george
>
>
>
>
>
> hotmail.com> wrote:

>>On May 7, 11:58 am, Deborah pumpetypump.com> wrote:

>>> On Wed, 7 May 2008 11:09:14 -0700 (PDT), george

>

>>> hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>On May 7, 11:06 am, Deborah pumpetypump.com> wrote:

>>>>> On Wed, 7 May 2008 10:12:09 -0700 (PDT), Lotus_Bloom

>

>>>>> tx.rr.com> wrote:

>>>>>>On May 7, 12:07 pm, george hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>> I sent you something at the email address on file here and it came
>>>>>>> back undelievered.
>>>>>>> Thanks, ...