|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: CarrieCarrie Date: Jul 31, 2007 08:44
"Katie" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:46af3d70$0$20565$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...>
> "Deborah" noemail.com> wrote in message
>>> And you wonder why people here think you're in cahoots with Katie...
>>
>> Deborah (BC)
>
> That's why we're not meant to mention the other thing either.
>
I think I'm in cahoots with you and Chuck too
Seems like the reallly "in" place to be.
"Cahoots"... another interesting word. Reminds me of old Roy Rogers/Gabby
Hayes movies.
Them Varmits are in cahoots with thems who robbed that dern bank!
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 31, 2007 11:05
On Jul 31, 10:44 am, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:> "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:46af3d70$0$20565$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>
>>> "Deborah" noemail.com> wrote in message>
>>> And you wonder why people here think you're in cahoots with Katie...
>
>>> Deborah (BC)
>
>> That's why we're not meant to mention the other thing either.
>
> I think I'm in cahoots with you and Chuck too
|
| Show full article (0.78Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: AA Date: Jul 31, 2007 19:43
Chuck wrote:
[snip]
> I don't wonder why people here think I'm in cahoots with Katie. Any
> wonder I have is about why people think I'm in cahoots with Katie
> about things that I'm not in cahoots with Katie.
The fact is, you stupid bastard, you attack
people Katie attack. Also, you conveniently
overlook Katie's uncivil behavior while you
comment on people who's behavior is better.
Other than that I can't imagine why, Chuck.
[snip]
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AA Date: Jul 31, 2007 19:45
Carrie wrote:
> "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:46af3d70$0$20565$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...>> "Deborah" noemail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> And you wonder why people here think you're in cahoots with Katie...
>>>
>>> Deborah (BC)
>> That's why we're not meant to mention the other thing either.
>>
>
> I think I'm in cahoots with you and Chuck too
>
> Seems like the reallly "in" place to be.
>
> "Cahoots"... another interesting word. Reminds me of old Roy Rogers/Gabby
> Hayes movies.
>
> Them Varmits are in cahoots with thems who robbed that dern bank!
|
| Show full article (0.76Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Aug 1, 2007 00:18
On Jul 31, 10:43 pm, A bcde.com> wrote:> Chuck wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> I don't wonder why people here think I'm in cahoots with Katie. Any
>> wonder I have is about why people think I'm in cahoots with Katie
>> about things that I'm not in cahoots with Katie.
>
> The fact is, you stupid bastard, you attack
> people Katie attack.
So do you.
> Also, you conveniently
> overlook Katie's uncivil behavior while you
> comment on people who's behavior is better.
So do you.
> Other than that I can't imagine why, Chuck.
Neither can I.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Aug 1, 2007 00:24
On Jul 31, 9:52 am, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:> ..and you'll be free
> Say the word and be like me
> Say the word I'm thinking of
> Have you heard the word is........
Bird.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Aug 1, 2007 00:38
On Jul 31, 9:52 am, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:
> Latholemono !
In my spare moments I've been contemplating this and discovered a
whole new dimension of experience that I, here to fore, had only
touched on by accident. I find the crystalization of focus to be a
useful integration of what I had previously thought of as independent
considerations. Now I find the possibilities expansive in the creation
of new experiences, having an assured and tested base on which to
build.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DeborahDeborah Date: Aug 1, 2007 00:47
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:38:23 -0700, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Jul 31, 9:52 am, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Latholemono !
>
>In my spare moments I've been contemplating this and discovered a
>whole new dimension of experience that I, here to fore, had only
>touched on by accident. I find the crystalization of focus to be a
>useful integration of what I had previously thought of as independent
>considerations. Now I find the possibilities expansive in the creation
>of new experiences, having an assured and tested base on which to
>build.
hdkkj cgibke irjbked, shg kugiolwe.
Deborah (BC)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Aug 1, 2007 00:59
On Jul 31, 9:52 am, "Katie" yahoo.com> wrote:>> At a very abstract level, everyone posting here is in cahoots with
>> with everyone else posting here.
>
> And on a very practical level as well! They've been forming backchannel
> alliances, strategizing, plotting and scheming for years, so naturally they
> would project the same behavior onto others.
On this point we have no shelter, as far as I'm concerned, except what
we each convey independently as our personal testimony. In this case
we have access to the most powerful back channel I can think of, that
being a viable relationship in 3D that is not centered on what we
create between us on line.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: DeborahDeborah Date: Aug 1, 2007 01:21
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:59:26 -0700, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> At a very abstract level, everyone posting here is in cahoots with
>>> with everyone else posting here.
>>
>> And on a very practical level as well! They've been forming backchannel
>> alliances, strategizing, plotting and scheming for years, so naturally they
>> would project the same behavior onto others.
>
>On this point we have no shelter, as far as I'm concerned, except what
>we each convey independently as our personal testimony.
Shelter? You are the ones who chose to insinuate yourselves into OUR
newsgroup. You can leave anytime you wish. And nobody here will miss
you.
Deborah (BC)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
