> On May 6, 4:45 am, "m.a.z" rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>>>> CHARTER: talk.religion.course-miracle

>>>>> " talk.religion.course-miracle will be a newsgroup
>>>>> " for the open discussion of A Course in Miracles,
>>>>> " its principles, and the practical application of
>>>>> " its teachings. Acceptable discussions will include
>>>>> " how A Course in Miracles affects our lives, our
>>>>> " experiences in practicing the teachings,
>>>>> " discussions and debates concerning our
>>>>> " understanding of its teachings, personal insights
>>>>> " in the form of poetry and essays, and other forms
>>>>> " of relating to the teachings of A Course in
>>>>> " Miracles.
>>>>> "
>>>>> " This newsgroup will serve as a world-wide
>>>>> " networking vehicle for A Course in Miracles and
>>>>> " therefore acceptable posts will include notices of
>>>>> " ACIM related events, notices of media coverage of
>>>>> " A Course in Miracles, notices of publications
>>>>> " related to A Course in Miracles, and any other
>>>>> " news items concerning A Course in Miracles.
>>>>> "
>>>>> " Due to the nature of the teachings of A Course in
>>>>> " Miracles, it is not necessary to discourage any
>>>>> " flames in discussions about ACIM, but discussions
>>>>> " unrelated to A Course in Miracles shall be
>>>>> " discouraged.

>>>> As far as the TRC-M charter, Maz only quoted part of it.  I posted the
>>>> complete
>>>> charter.  If you cannot understand why the last paragraph was put into
>>>> the
>>>> charter, I suggest you spend a bit of time meditating on the purpose of
>>>> it.

>

>>> I can understand the purpose. It was to create a systemic system  of
>>> attack where attack was justified as part of course discussion.

>

>> John, you know I do object to this conclusion and misrepresentation
>> of the student's motives to create this group. I OBJECT VEHEMENTLY.
>> Not only was I there, I also understand that assigning this motive
>> is focussing on the lack of Love instead of on the miracle.

>
> Oh, you object vehemently that this was actually planned, and is
> rather just another SAFU by committee.
>
> Yeah, well could be. I don't believe a lot of thought went into
> thinking about consequences of an unmoderated news net miracles
> discussion group.
>
> .- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -