On Jul 7, 6:24 pm, Tera Free Nws
gmail.com> wrote:
> ~~ Gee. All in jest. Well, Chuck that unfortunately puts you in Katie
> Dean as authors of volumes of posts which can be easily interpreted
> differently.
I am not responsible for and do not control what Katie posts. Deal
with me.
> The game of character assassination is NOT jest. You and
> Dean are being dismissed as either sexual addicts and possible
> deviates, or alternatively as character assassins using sexually
> bigoted language to skewer your targets.
Your dismissal means nothing to me, please dismiss me, pretty please.
> Now do you and Katie Dean want to wage an up hill battle disproving
> the charge you and Dean are sexual addicts and deviates despite your
> volumes of sexually deviant posts,
This is an example of your intellectual superiority and integrity? LOL
> or do you wish to play nice and get
> out of the character assassination game?
You are attempting to make me responsible for events that happened in
different spaces, at different times, in different contexts and a
connect the lines argument you have fabricated. I decline. If you can
sell this to someone else, then they're as much of a dupe as you have
created for yourself. Enjoy their company, pray for my depraved soul
if you will and acknowledge your failure in being my salvation. I have
not engaged in any character assassination game, that would be you and
you are an excellent teacher. I've learned a lot from your example. So
make of this what you will, go f*ck yourself. I hope you enjoy the
experience, you seem to have way too many built up male hormones for
your own good, and if not your own good, for the good of anyone in
your presence. If this appears to be a non intellectual response, it
is and it's delivered in kind to my reception of your post and your
continued whining. Grow up, you are not a child in years and if you
insist on treating me as one, I am capable of responding in kind. I am
not better than you, I am capable of dealing with you.
