| Re: But What Did You Write This Past FIVE Years, Katie? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: talk.religion.coursemiracle · Group Profile
Author: Tera Free NwsTera Free Nws Date: Jul 7, 2007 15:24
On Jul 7, 4:42 pm, Chuck yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Obviously there is NO reason to telegraph, introduce and project your
>> and Dean's private sexual practices and fetishes on to other posters.
>> When you do so, and do so inappropriately and maliciously, this
>> constitutes an alliance to promote your sexual practices on others who
>> do not share and are not interested in your sexual practices.
>
> As I recall, the introduction of this topic in this place was your
doing.
~~Really? Well you are wrong. The pictures wouldn't have even merited
a remark if Katie Dean wasn't already using cross-dressing degradation
to skewer people on this newsgroup.
As I recall, there was a limited exchange on CF about this. As
> I recall, both Katie and I attempted explain ourselves here and state
> that it was a jest (which is the correct interpretation as far as I'm concerned).
~~ Gee. All in jest. Well, Chuck that unfortunately puts you in Katie
Dean as authors of volumes of posts which can be easily interpreted
differently. The game of character assassination is NOT jest. You and
Dean are being dismissed as either sexual addicts and possible
deviates, or alternatively as character assassins using sexually
bigoted language to skewer your targets.
Now do you and Katie Dean want to wage an up hill battle disproving
the charge you and Dean are sexual addicts and deviates despite your
volumes of sexually deviant posts, or do you wish to play nice and get
out of the character assassination game?
| 
