Hi folks,

I just thought I'd provide a new thread without the full-name
subject header insult directed at Doug, for those who wanted
to respond to John's post without a thread of messages
extending that insult and tactic of his.

~ Lee

Doc Theo wrote:

John,

I'll put this as simply as possible, for you.

If you use another person's full name in a
derogatory subject header, or if Carrie's name
and location appear AT ALL in another of your
posts, your entire legal name is going to appear
in the subject header of a Lopez disclaimer, as
a direct consequence.

Given that I've known your name for almost a
year, you must know that I'd rather not disclose
it. Personally, I'm concerned about what will
turn up in a background check.

Drop the tactic, and the full-name harassment
of your designated enemies. We have done
quite well as a discussion board, without that
unfortunate element of our recent past. And I'm
convinced that you use the tactic, only because
you have believed that you are immune.

Doc Theo wrote:

I have no idea what you mean by this

If you're going to accuse me of something like racist attacks it
might help to be specific about it.

I am the most UNracist and overall accepting person you would ever
know. I just have a problem with people I see as outright lying.

Carrie wrote:

______________________________________________-

Gee, Carrie. Its clear enough all the people you accuse of lying have
no reputation for lying and in fact, the only person I see making a
whole group of people liars is YOU, and your position that nearly
everyone but you is lying.

On the other hand, Carrie you have a well deserved and notorious
reputation for lying and being an unrepentant liar. Many, many poster
have written you are a liar and vicious gossip. More than a few posters
have posted detailed description of you hate games. Spoofs and even a
parody of your hate gossip are common place.

Doc Theo wrote:

Carrie wrote:

Yeah, we all know the fall back position is "Brothers in Christ,"
rhetoric when all the ethnic slurs and dirty deeds come to light.

Doc Theo wrote:
I would really prefer not sending a complaint

is there one?

First of all you'd have to spell the word correctly (Reiki) in order
to find out where to write.

It might be interesting to know what the Canadian authorities would
think of your accusations about what goes on, on this newsgroup, and
what you make of them.

Lee wrote:

Actually you are, Lee. Since otherwise you open yourself to the
justified charge that are using personal information not willing
divulged by me, but made public by unfortunate circumstance and wide
spread human suffering for your own personal agenda. Moreover partially
verified only by your own ploy of benevolence and concern. Not ethical.

Lee,

"Just reel it in a bit, and your screwball rants will remain safely
anonymous. Fair enough? I really think so."

Oh brother.

You remind me of Tom and Carmen, when they joined with another, as
Carrie cheered, to find my son.

Threats in order to attempt to hide the truth of the matter.

This is personal coercion, plain and simple, Lee.

Where were you when my place of work, and address, was posted by "your
good friend," Tom, with suggestion I should be harassed at work for
disagreeing with his hate campaigns concerning Paul and Susan Tuttle?

And where were you when Carmen wrote malicious sexual innunendo in
regards to Trisha on line and "her panties" in order to attempt to make
Trisha bend to her and Tom's wishes?

And where were you when Tom posted information in regards to my
divorce, which he searched online, and through the clerks office here
in order to degrade me personally? And all of this due to my decision
to give voice to his attempts at publicly degrading a man who has
brought so much good to the world---Paul Tuttle?

Jeanette wrote: