|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: PieterPieter
Date: Jan 13, 2007 15:20
"Carrie" kingcon.com> schreef in bericht
news:eobocp$8nt$1@jaszczomp.tahoe.pl...>
> "Pieter" wrote in message
> news:45a96206$0$27619$bf4948fe@news.tele2.nl...
>>
>> "Carrie" kingcon.com> schreef in bericht
>> news:eoblht$7m7$1@jaszczomp.tahoe.pl...
>>>>> Since Maz doesn't seem to be around.
>>>
>>> To me, THIS is more in line with A Course in Miracles
>>>
>>> T-26.VII.17........... 2 Forgiveness is the answer to attack of any
>>> kind.
>>> 3 So is attack deprived of its effects, and hate
>>> is answered in the name of love.
>>>
>>> Even though, for course discussion one might question seeing something
>>> as attack (in need of forgiveness) in the first place. ...
|
| Show full article (1.41Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: CarrieCarrie
Date: Jan 13, 2007 15:19
"Carmen" wrote in message
news:6viiq2tve309tre7sg0ha1j8bmjtujvctm@4ax.com...> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:56:02 +0100, "Pieter"
> wrote:
>
>>Disagreement
>>becomes meaningful and instructive,
>>and a basis for communication,
>>if being accompanied with
>>reasonable arguments.
>
> ...and a willingness to hear. ;-)
>
> [snip]
>
>>And having [good] manners is not a vice.
>
> ACIM's author agrees:
>
> "You should know that all God's children are fully worthy of COMPLETE ...
|
| Show full article (2.47Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: CarrieCarrie
Date: Jan 13, 2007 15:07
"A" bcd.com> wrote in message
news:h9mdnQXv9MexyjTYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@adelphia.com...> Carrie wrote:
>
>> I have said I believe everyone has their own version of reality and
>> "truth" and nobody is anymore right or wrong than anyone else.
>>
>> We create our own "reality" (and truth, as we see it) with our mind.
>>
>> I've been told I am wrong about this and truth, reality and right/wrong
>> is absolute (though I don't know who decides WHAT this is, that someone
>> who doesn't agree is wrong about?)
>>
>> yet, in the course it clearly says we create our own reality and
>> world.
>
> It also says -this- about "Truth":
>
> "The first chaotic law is that the truth is different
> for everyone." ...
|
| Show full article (1.47Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: CarrieCarrie
Date: Jan 13, 2007 15:01
"Pieter" wrote in message
news:45a96206$0$27619$bf4948fe@news.tele2.nl...
>
> "Carrie" kingcon.com> schreef in bericht
> news:eoblht$7m7$1@jaszczomp.tahoe.pl...
>>> Since Maz doesn't seem to be around.
>>
>> To me, THIS is more in line with A Course in Miracles
>>
>> T-26.VII.17........... 2 Forgiveness is the answer to attack of any kind.
>> 3 So is attack deprived of its effects, and hate
>> is answered in the name of love.
>>
>> Even though, for course discussion one might question seeing something
>> as attack (in need of forgiveness) in the first place.
>
> If I perceive an attack, then,
> as a follower of the Course,
> forgiveness should be the answer. ...
|
| Show full article (1.17Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: PieterPieter
Date: Jan 13, 2007 14:29
"Carmen" schreef in bericht
news:6viiq2tve309tre7sg0ha1j8bmjtujvctm@4ax.com...> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:56:02 +0100, "Pieter"
> wrote:
>
>>Disagreement
>>becomes meaningful and instructive,
>>and a basis for communication,
>>if being accompanied with
>>reasonable arguments.
>
> ...and a willingness to hear. ;-)
>
> [snip]
>
>>And having [good] manners is not a vice.
>
> ACIM's author agrees:
>
> "You should know that all God's children are fully worthy of COMPLETE ...
|
| Show full article (1.19Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: AKA gray asphaltAKA gray asphalt
Date: Jan 13, 2007 14:28
"Katie" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:45a8dedc$0$5234$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...>> Katie, your routine is just old.
>
> Yes, consistancy is the enemy of the culitified and superstitious, I'm
> aware of that. Not that you aren't quite the broken record on the topic
> of your own Specialness yourself.
>
>> If you ever want to talk about what's eating you, I'd be interested.
>
> Well, I do find it annoying when people assign motives for me and tell me
> how I'm feeling, but I do realize in your case that you don't have much
> choice. It's either have enough respect for both of us to give fair
> consideration to my comments or justify not doing so with a lame excuse or
> two and avoid the possibility of facing a challenge to your ill-conceived
> "beliefs". Like the alleged belief that something has to be wrong with
> someone for finding you to be just a tad hypocritical and dishonest.
>
> But be assured, if anything was eating me, you' wouldn't even be in the
> lineup of folks I'd seek out to have a discussion with. Why on earth do ...
|
| Show full article (1.26Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: CarrieCarrie
Date: Jan 13, 2007 14:13
Since Maz doesn't seem to be around.
To me, THIS is more in line with A Course in Miracles
T-26.VII.17........... 2 Forgiveness is the answer to attack of any kind.
3 So is attack deprived of its effects, and hate is
answered in the name of love.
Even though, for course discussion one might question seeing something as
attack (in need of forgiveness) in the first place.
But, once you have seen something as attack, it's too late to NOT see it
that way.
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: CarrieCarrie
Date: Jan 13, 2007 14:07
Now the posts aren't showing at all.
From Jan 9 till yesterday they were showing but stopped at Jan 9 in the AM.
That was the day they did their scheduled maintenence. It seemed to be fixed
again, but I didn't see any posts I wrote on the news server (I found, that
comes in Outlook Express) showed up on google.
Now today it's not there, and a message saying there's an error.
I thought it might just be Usenet groups so checked the moderated TCMM
board, and it has a post from Jan 12 (it isn't too active so it's hard to
tell if it's working or not). But, there are several posts on it that are in
response to someone else's but they're not there. Only the responses to
them.
Unless the people deleted them.
Doesn't seem like we can accomplish much (whatever we were accomplishing)
without all the posts and all the sources of posts showing up on all
formats.
|
| Show full article (1.29Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Lee FlynnLee Flynn
Date: Jan 13, 2007 12:35
Heya folks,
In this adaptation of these three paragraphs from the Urtext,
I have inserted either '_you' or '_your' as an exercise in
adding emphasis or impact to a very significant passage.
I'm curious whether anyone believes that this personalizing
of generic references to "the ego" with the 'you' and 'your'
substitutions changes the *meaning* of this passage.
I'm especially curious about how Ellen and other non-dual
proponents account for the "YOU" that is clearly distinguished
from one's ego, here.
______________
1171. March 30, 1966
|
| Show full article (3.72Kb) |
|
4 Comments |
|
|
|
|
