Katie, your routine is just old. If you ever want to talk about what's
eating you, I'd be interested.

"Katie" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:45a79463$0$5235$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

You're right, your disclaimer and hate/accusation posts should be
ignored and skipped.

I keep trying to find something course related to discuss with you
based on them. But, why tie in with your mean spirited judgement, which
is no way course, related and keep it going all the more.

Katie pointed that out somewhere here, and it's a good point.

I don't see many others here giving attention to your disclaimers
and campaign to make the ng the way YOU have decided it should be.

How come none of you Assholeys can handle being disagreed with, or
worse, facing a fact?

Faith

Walking in faith, I invite the goodness of God into my life every day.

As children, we may have participated in a "trust walk." We closed our eyes and let another person lead the way. Totally dependent on the person to lead us, we may have felt uneasy at first. As the walk progressed, we learned to trust our guide.

However, the most dependable guide we can have in any situation or circumstance is God. As we take all things to God in prayer, closing our eyes and spending time with God in the silence, our level of trust increases. Soon, our meditation and our walk with God become a natural part of who we are.

We realize that we are never alone in this world or in the challenges we experience. As we walk in faith, rather than by sight, our trust grows and we invite the goodness of God into our lives every day.

"Our heart is glad in him, because we trust in his holy name." -Psalm 33:21

dailyword.com

Faith
 
Walking in faith, I invite the goodness of God into my life
every day.
 
As children, we may have participated in a “trust walk.” We
closed our eyes and let another person lead the...

"Nancy" wrote in message
news:1168625165.874276.50270@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

"Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote in message news:eo8f7l$oil$1@jaszczomp.tahoe.pl...

No. Why do you insist upon being such an asshole?

If you think that's gossip, you should be ashamed of yourself, but you would have to be human
first for that, huh?

So you're saying that your Cult of Denial is different than their Cult of Denial since it's not
you at the top of the list for people in line for legal retributions in this Cult of Denial?

"maz" hotmai.com> wrote in message
news:RP6dnaG8hPn_9jrYnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@fiberworld.nl...

Yes, so you keep saying, yet your smear campaigns and slanders haven't yet culiminated into any
tangible effects on my or my husband's lives.

We know that Holey Nancy makes all sorts of claims, but the astute observer knows that she says
lots of stuff, depending on the need of the moment. If you are unaware, or indifferent to the
facts it makes no difference. Holey Nancy has thanked me many times for my comments about her
attempted channelling career, and credited me with having promoted her services to a larger
complimentary and grateful audience.

But the problem is, maz, Holey Nancy is a completely different case, as she has publicly declared
herself and set up shop on the net with her Jesus Channeling business. When people make public
claims about themselves and offer their services, the threshold for slander or libel becomes
extremely high. If Nancy doesn't want to experience the consequences of her own choices, it's
kinda tough, because the cow left that barn and moved on to someone's hamburger bun a loooooong
looooong time ago, so not much use in trying to close that door now.

"Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote in message news:eo8e8d$oad$1@jaszczomp.tahoe.pl...

And that has what to do with cheezy platitudes, Carrie?

Don't you ever get tired of parroting yourself parroting yourself parroting yourself?

Your existance has got to be the longest case of uncontrollable hiccups ever to be witnessed in
the history of all humanity.

Do you have any control over anything in your life? Certainly not the broken dam that serves as a
brain for most folks.

Last week one of my computers hung, or more properly "stalled" when
accessing the on-line Concordance, but since the others didn't, I figured it
was some configuration issue and didn't give it much thought. This morning
a SECOND computer began displaying the same phenomenon, only with IE (not
with Firefox) and on both the On-line and CD versions of the Concordance.
When one initiates a search the CPU goes to 100%% and that lasts for several
minutes before the command, which normally takes only a fraction of a
second, completes.

On the third computer, IE still works fine on either on-line or CD
Concordance.

I ran Ad-aware, Pest Patrol, and Spybot ... and while they cleaned up quite
a bit of junk, that had no impact on the IE problem. I ran all the
Microsoft updates (except of course that to IE 7, which I have been warned
against using in its present form) and that had no effect.

Both the on-line and CD Concordances worked fine on all these computers a
week ago ... first on one, and now on a second, it's showing this same
problem of being deadly slow and sucking up an enormous number of CPU cycles
... while the third (the oldest and slowest of the lot) is working just
fine, thankyou ... all have the same XP OS and IE 6.