> gig wrote:

>> "Carrie" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:1167573438.727237.95950@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...

>

>>>...

>
> "mr bill" yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
> news:2Xhmh.19655$ky2.19192@newsfe21.lga...

>> maz, your spam stinks as much as why you are spamming.
>>
>> -

>
> thanks bill. As I think you got it wrong thinking "neo"is robin,
> I think you got this one wrong as well.
>
> I am taking on the job to disclaim Dean's abuse.
> By now, the majority of posters see the sense
> in that. I will be happy to follow my own advise
> completely (i truly haven't read her messages, just replied
> appropriately today)
> as soon as its an established way to avoid feeding
> into the anti-christ rhetoric here. It makes sense,
> and the response is clearly unified so far. ...

> Group: talk.religion.course-miracle Date: Mon, Jan 1, 2007, 1:30pm
> (EST-3) From: starchild1...@yahoo.com (Carrie)
> on the moderated group I am not a...

> Group: talk.religion.course-miracle Date: Mon, Jan 1, 2007, 2:07pm
> (EST-3) From: starchild1124@yahoo.com (Carrie)
> Nancy wrote:
> Are you still the moderator of the other board?
> If so, why don't we adjourn there so we can dis- cuss this issue?
> Nancy
> ===================
> yeah, discuss people where they can't respond back.
> Why not email or phone?
> That way the people you're talking about won't even know it.
> Unless the emails or conversations are posted to prove
> points.
> ====================
> ~~And how does this become your business
> Carrie? Have you n o t h i n g better to do
> except concern yourself with others
> conversations?
> ~Kay

>>>On this NG I have abandoned

>
> SMV wrote:

>> I guess I'm confused! haha! admittedly I haven't been following all...

> "sonsation" 123.com> wrote in message
> news:62c5e$4599805a$3ea3b7a1$22205@news.chello.nl...

>>>> And anyone wonders why Katie sees A Course in Miracles the way she

>> does.<<
>>
>> Yawn.
>>
>> Carrie's Chaosverse in a nutshell:
>>
>> " I don't think God cares if people use him in their lies."

>
> I guess we're meant to take it that maz knows what God thinks and wants better than you do, and
> vice versa.

> no, it is an answer, not a defense. the course is quite clear in regards

> defenses, why do you ignore it? it is an answer to an idea, that does not
> make it a defense.
>

> --
>
> http://www.myspace.com/mrbill069
> http://blog.myspace.com/mrbill069
>
> Bill & Lindsay Wagoner - Parents
> Elizabeth Nicole Wagoner (Libby)
> Always and Forever
> Our Baby Girl
>
> Born on 2...

> Group: talk.religion.course-miracle Date: Mon, Jan 1, 2007, 1:38pm
> (EST-3) From: starchild1124@yahoo.com (Carrie)
> sonsation wrote:
> Who is ruining and trashing this newsgroup .?
> alan said it this way already:
> Finally, since you keep insisting that we "only see what we choose to
> see" and "how we see it is how it is for us", the irony obviously
> escapes you that you never ever apply that to yourself in your
> responses.
> "[...] Somehow in that pile of stinking poo that you call your brain,
> you've reasoned that it's acceptable behavior to spend time in a NG of
> posters that Dean can't stand, for the express purpose of annoying them,
> but the posters she's harassed are obliged to live up to a standard that
> you, yourself, haven't even once intended to live up to?
> If you ever modeled the behavior that you ask others to abide by, that
> would be one thing, but you're nasty when provoked, to the point that
> you react irrationally and defensively to things other people don't.
> Yet, in that pile of putrid much you call a your brain, you think you've
> earned the right to question other peoples reactions to ugly, nasty ...