|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: PieterPieter
Date: Jan 26, 2007 12:37
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2:11 pm, "Pieter" wrote:
>>> Awareness IS. It is not a something. It is both everything and
>>> nothing. In Its nothingness, everything is included.
|
| Show full article (1.72Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: CarrieCarrie
Date: Jan 26, 2007 12:17
On Jan 24, 9:47 pm, "SMV" aol.com> wrote:> Doug:I suppose the bottom line is that while some of us might not be overly
> fearful of someone slagging us, many other people ARE and these criminal
> harassment campaigns do chase them away, and we all lose from that.
>
> sv: yes, I do agree with that. sheryl
I'm interested in what you mean by criminal harrassment
campaigns, and WHO do you see being in them?
If I were to try and figure this out, like who is doing what and
might be driving people away (not responding from love, not showing
what ACIM teaches, etc) I would probablly come up with different names
than you. And others might, also. So, who is right in this?
What is the point of seeing criminal harrassment campaigns
(which implies plotting and planning and purposely writing something
from that, when it could be just the person writing what THEY
(personally) think, feel and believe about it) anyway?
I could say how does seeing some like as part of criminal
harrassment campaings fit with what ACIM says? But, some take this as
personal criticism and attack.
|
| Show full article (4.14Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: CarrieCarrie
Date: Jan 26, 2007 12:07
>
>
> On Jan 26, 10:45 am, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:>>> On Jan 26, 10:24 am, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:>>
>>>>> On Jan 26, 9:45 am, "Carrie" kingcon.com> wrote:>>>>>> "ellie" yahoo.com> wrote in ...
|
| Show full article (4.82Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: CarmenCarmen
Date: Jan 26, 2007 12:03
On 23 Jan 2007 14:31:53 -0800, "Gene" gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Carmen wrote:
>
>> And it showed me how, depending on how much work each one has done in
>> clearing OR obstructing their connection to that "internal compass,"
>> the ability to detect the "b.s." in any environment either gets better
>> or more impaired.
>
>I would love to think that when I detect BS I am showing how closely I
>listen to the Holy Spirit, but I have to suspect a lot of it boils down
>to reasoning on the ego level.
Reasoning on the ego level is what tells us it will profit us to
lie... iow, accept less than the *whole* truth from ourselves OR
others.
If there's one thing my experiences have shown me, dear Gene, it's
that you can have the BEST reasoning ability that the ego's world can
offer and still be ENTIRELY wrong and off the mark (consistently).
|
| Show full article (4.91Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: PieterPieter
Date: Jan 26, 2007 12:00
Dear gig,
Let me explain what I mean with an example.
When someone is sick, which is obvious
because of disturbing symptoms, his doctor
will examine him. To diagnose him, he looks for
the symptoms, which together...
|
| Show full article (8.59Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: KatieKatie
Date: Jan 19, 2007 20:05
>
> Carrie, I've been following this thread, but
> I don't understand your perspective that
> lying and pretending is honest. I do get the
> example that each of us is responding the
> way we feel we need to, though.
So you're saying that you feel you NEED to claim to channel Jesus, but provide none of the
information that "he" shares with you to the general public? Maybe it's only provided for the
Special People?
Or maybe you're Just Pretending?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: KatieKatie
Date: Jan 19, 2007 19:27
Considering that it's well known that they communicate to strategize elsewhere, this is an
incredibly dishonest response from maz.
No surprise, however, since ACIM provides ample mechanisms to deny such concepts as "honesty" or
"reality" hence making the easy leap to dishonesty as a speeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeritchual practice.
Which is the earmark of all destructive belief systems and cults.
One thing that maz has made abundantly clear is his utter contempt for sincerity between
"believers" and the rest of us. I call it the Arrogance Factor.
|
| Show full article (1.16Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: KatieKatie
Date: Jan 19, 2007 19:22
> Your above comment reminds me of Eddie Haskell in Leave it to Beaver.
> He really charmed the old ladies and acted like the perfect
> gentleman when he was after something, but when they turned their
> backs, he was an instigator and manipulator of the naive and gullible.
OMG! You are too funny for words! I was just scanning along and came across this one and had
to comment! The Beav was so profound on so many levels! Eddie Haskell was like a gift from
the Oracle...shades of things to come!!
Thanks for yet another amazing moment!!
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: KatieKatie
Date: Jan 19, 2007 19:17
> AKA:
> You haven't stimulated any thoughts in me ... only frustration and
> disappointment and a laugh at your sense of humor every now and then.
>
> bidhati:
> It's good that you have a sense of humor. Rarely does anyone get
> Katie's wit
I know, and that's why I love ya good buddy, and the belly laughs we can so easily share!! Woooo
wooooo!!
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: mazmaz
Date: Jan 19, 2007 09:26
"Carrie" >
> maz wrote:
> How can anyone be anything BUT open and honest?
>
> That's simple. Narrowminded, closed and looped thinking
> is not open. Disinformation games and untruth is dishonest.
> I thought you had figured this one out already.
>> And who decides what this is in someone else?
You do all the time, remember?
> Of course, you seeing me the way you do (disinformation games,
untruth, troll enabler, etc) is how you honestly think and feel and see
it.
I just don't see how you would think I'd be interested in being any
kind of friends with someone who writes to and about me the way you do.<
" I don't think God cares if people use him in their lies."
~ Carrie Starchild
|
| Show full article (1.39Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
