Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
talk.religion.buddhism only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

talk.religion.buddhism Profile…
 Up
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: DharmaTroll
Date: Nov 20, 2006 14:40

> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.

DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
that.
> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .

DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous posts
DT' (pronounced dee-tee-prime), and perhaps we shall avoid some of
your exponentially increasing self-contradictions. (I avoid the use
small-case dt, as I leave that term reserved for reference to the dt on
alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, who uses the same initials but is no relation
to My Divine Grace.)
Show full article (8.03Kb)
29 Comments
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: Hollywood Lee
Date: Nov 20, 2006 14:56

DharmaTroll wrote:
>> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.
>
> DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
> But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
> that.
>
>> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
>> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .
>
> DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
> real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
> claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous posts
> DT' (pronounced dee-tee-prime), and perhaps we shall avoid some of
> your exponentially increasing self-contradictions. (I avoid the use
> small-case dt, as I leave that term reserved for reference to the dt on
> alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, who uses the same initials but is no relation
> to My Divine Grace.)
>
> I would wonder if your claims about DT' are accurate? That is, given ...
Show full article (8.24Kb)
21 Comments
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: Evelyn Ruut
Date: Nov 20, 2006 15:26

"Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ejtbq2$lac$1@news.datemas.de...
> DharmaTroll wrote:
>>> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.
>>
>> DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
>> But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
>> that.
>>
>>> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
>>> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .
>>
>> DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
>> real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
>> claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous posts
>> DT' (pronounced dee-tee-prime), and perhaps we shall avoid some of
>> your exponentially increasing self-contradictions. (I avoid the use
>> small-case dt, as I leave that term reserved for reference to the dt on
>> alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, who uses the same initials but is no relation
>> to My Divine Grace.) ...
Show full article (8.68Kb)
20 Comments
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: Hollywood Lee
Date: Nov 20, 2006 15:40

Evelyn Ruut wrote:
> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ejtbq2$lac$1@news.datemas.de...
>> DharmaTroll wrote:
>>>> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.
>>> DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
>>> But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
>>> that.
>>>
>>>> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
>>>> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .
>>> DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
>>> real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
>>> claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous posts
>>> DT' (pronounced dee-tee-prime), and perhaps we shall avoid some of
>>> your exponentially increasing self-contradictions. (I avoid the use
>>> small-case dt, as I leave that term reserved for reference to the dt on
>>> alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, who uses the same initials but is no relation
>>> to My Divine Grace.)
>>> ...
Show full article (8.89Kb)
17 Comments
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: Evelyn Ruut
Date: Nov 20, 2006 15:57

"Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ejtee3$ih1$1@news.datemas.de...
> Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ejtbq2$lac$1@news.datemas.de...
>>> DharmaTroll wrote:
>>>>> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.
>>>> DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
>>>> But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>>> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
>>>>> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .
>>>> DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
>>>> real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
>>>> claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous posts
>>>> DT' (pronounced dee-tee-prime), and perhaps we shall avoid some of
>>>> your exponentially increasing self-contradictions. (I avoid the use
>>>> small-case dt, as I leave that term reserved for reference to the dt on
>>>> alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, who uses the same initials but is no relation ...
Show full article (9.53Kb)
10 Comments
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: stumper
Date: Nov 20, 2006 16:01

Hollywood Lee wrote:
> Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ejtbq2$lac$1@news.datemas.de...
>>> DharmaTroll wrote:
>>>>> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.
>>>> DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
>>>> But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>>> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
>>>>> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .
>>>> DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
>>>> real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
>>>> claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous posts
>>>> DT' (pronounced dee-tee-prime), and perhaps we shall avoid some of
>>>> your exponentially increasing self-contradictions. (I avoid the use
>>>> small-case dt, as I leave that term reserved for reference to the dt on
>>>> alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, who uses the same initials but is no relation
>>>> to My Divine Grace.) ...
Show full article (9.28Kb)
no comments
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: Hollywood Lee
Date: Nov 20, 2006 16:37

Evelyn Ruut wrote:
> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ejtee3$ih1$1@news.datemas.de...
>> Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>>> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ejtbq2$lac$1@news.datemas.de...
>>>> DharmaTroll wrote:
>>>>>> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.
>>>>> DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
>>>>> But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>>> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
>>>>>> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .
>>>>> DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
>>>>> real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
>>>>> claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous posts
>>>>> DT' (pronounced dee-tee-prime), and perhaps we shall avoid some of
>>>>> your exponentially increasing self-contradictions. (I avoid the use
>>>>> small-case dt, as I leave that term reserved for reference to the dt on ...
Show full article (10.29Kb)
9 Comments
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: Evelyn Ruut
Date: Nov 20, 2006 16:42

"Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ejthng$mkd$1@news.datemas.de...
> Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ejtee3$ih1$1@news.datemas.de...
>>> Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>>>> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:ejtbq2$lac$1@news.datemas.de...
>>>>> DharmaTroll wrote:
>>>>>>> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.
>>>>>> DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
>>>>>> But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
>>>>>>> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .
>>>>>> DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
>>>>>> real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
>>>>>> claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous
>>>>>> posts ...
Show full article (11.00Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: stumper
Date: Nov 20, 2006 16:46

Hollywood Lee wrote:
> Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ejtee3$ih1$1@news.datemas.de...
>>> Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>>>> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:ejtbq2$lac$1@news.datemas.de...
>>>>> DharmaTroll wrote:
>>>>>>> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.
>>>>>> DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
>>>>>> But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
>>>>>>> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .
>>>>>> DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
>>>>>> real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
>>>>>> claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous
>>>>>> posts
>>>>>> DT' (pronounced dee-tee-prime), and perhaps we shall avoid some of ...
Show full article (10.90Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Who is back? (was Re: budhism enquiry)         


Author: Evelyn Ruut
Date: Nov 20, 2006 16:53

"stumper" newvessel.com> wrote in message
news:pcicnfJXx6Gr0f_YUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Hollywood Lee wrote:
>> Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>>> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ejtee3$ih1$1@news.datemas.de...
>>>> Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>>>>> "Hollywood Lee" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:ejtbq2$lac$1@news.datemas.de...
>>>>>> DharmaTroll wrote:
>>>>>>>> It seems important to you that we believe you to be DT.
>>>>>>> DT: Important in the sense that winning a game is important, yes.
>>>>>>> But there's something more important to me about it, and I'll get to
>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While the real DT would have just cut through the crap, said
>>>>>>>> "fuck you' and got on with it, you go on and on an on and . . .
>>>>>>> DT: The real DT? But you have gone on and on that there can be no
>>>>>>> real DT. How can I even reply to you if you're going to start with
>>>>>>> claims like 0=1? But we can call the alleged real DT's previous ...
Show full article (11.45Kb)
2 Comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: budhism enquiry with sparklestalk.religion.buddhism ·
Re: Who is back in reruns? (was Re: budhism enquiry)talk.religion.buddhism ·
Re: budhism enquirytalk.religion.buddhism ·
1 2 3