> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:24:28 -0400, "^@%%>---*=#" hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>

>>
>>"DharmaTroll" my-deja.com> wrote in message
>>news:c610031f-c64d-4063-ba33-b2540f4e6d9f@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

>>> On Jun 9, 7:33 am, Tang Huyen gmail.com[remove]>
>>> wrote:

>>>> Ali wrote:

>>>>> Tang Huyen:

>>>>

>>>>>>"^@%%>---*=#":

>>>>

>

>>>> Is that a passable impression of Hinduism, you
>>>> two Hinduists?
>>>>
>>>> Tang Huyen

>>>
>>> That's pretty much my impression of Hinduism. And I think it can all
>>> be avoided if we take the 'ness' out of consciousness and try to make
>>> it into a thing, and that 'conscious' is an adjective or verb. And
>>> that we similarly remember that 'mind' is always a verb, not a noun.
>>> Hinduism, and indeed most other Supernaturalism, may stem partially
>>> from our bad use of grammar.
>>>
>>> Brains are conscious; there is no 'consciousness' nor some abstract
>>> Consciousness. If appliances could speak, there would probably no
>>> doubt be some Hinduist appliances. The toaster would say, "it is only
>>> an illusion that I am a toaster and you are a blender. For we both
>>> plug into the same electrical outlets, and really, only the Current is
>>> real. We are One with the Currant. Thus, there is only Electricity
>>> and Current, and all appearance as toasters or blenders is illusion
>>> and duality. Only the Non-Dual Current exists in perfect bliss and
>>> harmony".
>>>
>>> Yet in the end this is all complete nonsense. Toasters are toasters
>>> and blenders are blenders, and you can't make toast in the blender,
>>> and you can't make your smoothie in the toaster. And there is no
>>> mystical beastie called the Current with a capital 'c', just a plain
>>> old stream of electrons whose magnitude and direction vary cyclically.

>
> Your little Double-AA units just short-circuited bigtime there, dint
> they? Owchie!
>

>>> Ding! My toast is done. Gotta go.
>>>
>>> --DharmaTroll

>>
>>the only complete nonsense comes from your
>>attempt to understand by use of your convoluted
>>subsequence processing. your dire need for linear
>>logic will be the veil that 'protects' you from seeing
>>things in their true light. carry on.

>
> What *was* that scuttling noise in the kitchen?